2017
DOI: 10.1166/jno.2017.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Ternary Layer Photonic Band Gap Tunable Filters for Wavelength Division Multiplexing Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 and Fig. 7 shows that when incident angle changes from θ0 = 0° to θ0 = 25°, the resonant transmission peak of defect modes for all five samples shift toward lower wavelength side (blue shift) due to change in optical path length of light inside cavity region [26][27][28]. For example, Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Incident Light On the Performance Of Photonic Biosensormentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 and Fig. 7 shows that when incident angle changes from θ0 = 0° to θ0 = 25°, the resonant transmission peak of defect modes for all five samples shift toward lower wavelength side (blue shift) due to change in optical path length of light inside cavity region [26][27][28]. For example, Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Incident Light On the Performance Of Photonic Biosensormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, FOM of our biosensor is also high and it is of the order of 10 4 . The high value of FOM makes our design suitable for biosensing medical & engineering applications [25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: The Effect Of Incident Light On the Performance Of Photonic Biosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the major innovation of this manuscript is to reduce the cost of the proposed sensor, we use the microcavity structure. the 1D-PC is very simple in fabrication than others (2D and 3D) because of its simplest structure and very low cost compared to 2D and 3D structures (Pandey et al 2017 ; Li 2014 ). As cleared in Table 3 , most of the previous works that used the 1D-PC and some of the others that used 2D-PC recorded a very low sensitivity and Q-factor, but in this proposed structure, we recorded a super sensitivity (S = 3300 nm/RIU) at the optimum conditions (Abadla and Elsayed 2020 ; Mohamed et al 2016 ; Banerjee 2009 ).…”
Section: Effect Of the Incident Angle On Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the major innovation of this manuscript is to reduce the cost of the proposed sensor, we use the microcavity structure. the 1D-PC is very simple in fabrication than others (2D and 3D) because of its simplest structure and very low cost compared to 2D and 3D structures [66,67]. As cleared in Table 3, most of the previous works that used the 1D-PC and some of the others that used 2D-PC recorded a very low sensitivity and Qfactor, but in this proposed structure, we recorded a super sensitivity (S=3300 nm/RIU) at the optimum conditions [48][49][50].…”
Section: Effect Of the Incident Angle On Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%