2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the accuracy of the sky component calculation in daylighting simulation programs

Abstract: The main aim of this article is to analyze the precision of several lighting simulation programs regularly used in daylighting studies for architecture, following the methodology established in the CIE test cases document. The 3DS Max Design 2014, Daylight Visualizer 2.6, DaySim 3.1b, Design Builder 3.0, Dialux 4.8, Ecotect Analysis 2011, Lightscape 3.2 and Relux Pro programs are analyzed. In order to establish the precision for each program, the sky component is measured at different points of study on the fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These economic results are more significant than the Stockholm ones (a NPV10 increase of 24.3%, 34.8% and 40.7% in the three cases) due both to the higher electric energy cost in the United Kingdom and the higher annual energy saving of lighting control systems in London. 35.6% compared to Stockholm and London, respectively), obtaining the highest economic savings for rooms 8.00 m wide or more (average NPV10 of 1209.58 €, an increase of 81.0% and 33.7%, respectively), especially for rooms 9.00 m deep. In the same way, the greatest economic savings after 10 years are obtained when smart systems are used, with an average NPV10 improvement compared to case 1, of 74% for case 2 and 123% for case 3.…”
Section: Cost Effectiveness In Londonmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These economic results are more significant than the Stockholm ones (a NPV10 increase of 24.3%, 34.8% and 40.7% in the three cases) due both to the higher electric energy cost in the United Kingdom and the higher annual energy saving of lighting control systems in London. 35.6% compared to Stockholm and London, respectively), obtaining the highest economic savings for rooms 8.00 m wide or more (average NPV10 of 1209.58 €, an increase of 81.0% and 33.7%, respectively), especially for rooms 9.00 m deep. In the same way, the greatest economic savings after 10 years are obtained when smart systems are used, with an average NPV10 improvement compared to case 1, of 74% for case 2 and 123% for case 3.…”
Section: Cost Effectiveness In Londonmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Given that variations in the threshold cited would affect the results on the impact of energy efficiency from lighting smart controls, the illuminance value must be chosen carefully, based on use. The spacing between luminaires was calculated using Dialux 4.12, a simulation program validated by previous studies [35] and widely used in electric lighting design. In accordance with the results obtained, the separation between luminaires in each of the rows was optimized to achieve a uniformity value above 0.6 and an average illuminance of 500 lx, obtaining a spacing of 1.25 m, as can be seen in Figure 2.…”
Section: Lighting Design Of the Room Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DaySim was developed to provide a more efficient calculation of illuminance or luminance time series under varying sky conditions than that originally provided by RADIANCE. This lighting software has been validated by several researchers [24,25] who have determined accuracy by applying the CIE test cases [26]. The calculation parameters used by this program in this research are shown in Table I.…”
Section: B Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAYSIM was developed to provide a more efficient calculation of illuminance or luminance time series under varying sky conditions than that originally provided by RADIANCE. This lighting software has been validated by several researchers [24], [25] who have determined accuracy by applying the CIE test cases [24]. The calculation parameters used by this program in this research are shown in Table I.…”
Section: B Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weather data for all locations are taken from the Energy Plus reference [ 25 ], based on direct normal and diffuse horizontal irradiances and the sky model defined by Perez et al [26].…”
Section: Sky Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%