2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1455685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the admittance-frequency and capacitance–voltage of dense SnO2⋅CoO-based varistor ceramics

Abstract: This article describes the admittance-frequency feature of a class of SnO 2 •CoO-based polycrystalline ceramics with high nonlinear current-voltage characteristics ͑nonlinear coefficients above 50͒. Broad relaxation peaks caused by the presence of deep trap states were characterized based on the admittance response of different systems doped with La 2 O 3 , Pr 2 O 3 , and CeO 2. The calculation of the energy of this deep trap level revealed not only that all the compositions share the same value but also that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
54
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…͑1͒ combined with a complex capacitance analysis. [6][7][8] Table I presents the comparative values and other typical non-Ohmic parameters of the MOV system studied here. Therefore, ␣ and electric breakdown field ͑E b ͒ were found to be about 75 and 6900 V cm −1 , respectively.…”
Section: E = Hfz M ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…͑1͒ combined with a complex capacitance analysis. [6][7][8] Table I presents the comparative values and other typical non-Ohmic parameters of the MOV system studied here. Therefore, ␣ and electric breakdown field ͑E b ͒ were found to be about 75 and 6900 V cm −1 , respectively.…”
Section: E = Hfz M ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…useful in calculating the barrier height value and in establishing a good relationship between potential barrier height and non-Ohmic properties. 6,7 However, in most situations, the barrier height values may be poorly estimated if the materials contain few active barriers, mainly because the calculated p value would be higher than the real value. In other words, the p value is a source of error in the calculation of the potential barrier height and Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations