2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the angle-only orbit determination for optical tracking strategy of Korea GEO satellite, COMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed data from the survey observation were suitable for sparsecase orbit determination. The positional errors did not exceed 10 km in 7 days for this observation scenario (Choi et al 2015). On the other hand, Kawase (2000) verified theoretically that a 2-day observation over 4 hr decreased the orbit determination error compared with that of a 1-day observation.…”
Section: Orbit Determination Strategysupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed data from the survey observation were suitable for sparsecase orbit determination. The positional errors did not exceed 10 km in 7 days for this observation scenario (Choi et al 2015). On the other hand, Kawase (2000) verified theoretically that a 2-day observation over 4 hr decreased the orbit determination error compared with that of a 1-day observation.…”
Section: Orbit Determination Strategysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Musci et al (2004) showed that the orbital information of newly detected objects can be maintained in a few days by follow-up observation during the next 3 days. On the other hand, Choi et al (2015) used three sporadically obtained sets of observation data in 10 hr per day and obtained a positional error not exceeding 10 km in 7 days. This calculation requires more than 20 points per set.…”
Section: Orbit Determination Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The associated orbit overlap errors compared with Compass-G1 final orbit from GFZ AC were 3.747 m, 22.375 m, and 22.406 m, in radial, in-track, and cross-track directions, respectively, and the 3D RMS error was 31.89 m. These OD results imply that the orbit accuracy can remain within 50 m when more than nine SLR observations are available for a single SLR station. Given that the radar-based OD achieved three-sigma position accuracy on the order of 1.5 km [ 5 ], and the optical-tracking-based OD precision for GEO satellite was about km-level [ 6 ], SLR can be an alternative observation for enhancing OD of GEO satellites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hwang et al [ 5 ] performed the OD of GK-1 with single station antenna to yield position accuracy of 1.5 km. Choi et al [ 6 ] conducted OD by angles-only optical tracking data of GK-1 for 2-day arc to have less than 2 km maximum difference from two-line elements (TLEs). Unlike GK-2A, GK-2B will be equipped with a laser retro-reflector array (LRA) to acquire satellite laser ranging (SLR) observation data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%