2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207540902950852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the bullwhip effect in multi-product, multi-stage supply chain systems–a simulation approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally believed that a smaller batch size helps to stabilise orders and to reduce operational cost (Burbidge, 1961;Caplin, 1985;Lee et al, 1997;Holland & Sodhi, 2004;Wangphanich et al, 2010). However, if the batch size is a multiple of average demand, then reducing the batch size may not be necessary (Potter and Disney, 2006;Li and Sridharan, 2008).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is generally believed that a smaller batch size helps to stabilise orders and to reduce operational cost (Burbidge, 1961;Caplin, 1985;Lee et al, 1997;Holland & Sodhi, 2004;Wangphanich et al, 2010). However, if the batch size is a multiple of average demand, then reducing the batch size may not be necessary (Potter and Disney, 2006;Li and Sridharan, 2008).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Giard and Sali (2013), the only two works considering the SCN structure as a potential driver of the BWE are the framework of Geary et al (2006) and the simulation study of Wangphanich et al (2010). The framework of the former authors merely identifies the well-known "number of echelon" as a root cause of the BWE.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, which have used fuzzy approaches for improving supply chain ordering or reducing the bullwhip effect can be found in Xiong and Helo (2006), Balan et al (2007), Zarandi et al (2008), Lin et al (2010), Wangphanich et al (2010), Cannella and Ciancimino (2010), Kristianto et al (2012) and Cannella et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%