2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the center of pressure displacement, ground reaction force and muscular activity during step exercises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the PFPS subjects failed to increase their GM activity at the same knee flexion angle that they carried out the greatest excursion of contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, and knee abduction, when compared with the confrol group. Our results are in agreement with a previous study (34) that also found decreased GM activation in PFPS subjects during a stepping task compared with controls but in confrast with others that reported no difference between groups (28,29,35,41). Differences in the methodology used to assess GM activation may have accounted for the different results among studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that the PFPS subjects failed to increase their GM activity at the same knee flexion angle that they carried out the greatest excursion of contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, and knee abduction, when compared with the confrol group. Our results are in agreement with a previous study (34) that also found decreased GM activation in PFPS subjects during a stepping task compared with controls but in confrast with others that reported no difference between groups (28,29,35,41). Differences in the methodology used to assess GM activation may have accounted for the different results among studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have reported diminished hip abductor sfrength in sedentary individuals and female athletes with PFPS when compared with pain-free confrols (6,20,24), but no study compared isometric hip abductor torque between males and females with PFPS. Previous studies have evaluated the magnitude of gluteus médius (GM) activation during ftinctional activities in subjects with PFPS as compared with the controls (28,29,34,35,41). However, the studies cited only evaluated the overall activity ofthe GM or its activation in the stance phase during weight-bearing activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Saad [30] observed major total displacement of the COP and greater instability during dynamic activity in PFP subjects; however, we believe that it may occur as a result of the influence of the medial-lateral oscillation over the total stability. The total COP variable is calculated based on the displacement anteriorposterior and medial-lateral directions of the COP, and the anteriorposterior was similar in both groups.…”
Section: Dynamic Postural Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Five studies31 35 37 38 40 evaluated muscle activation levels (peak or average/linear envelope) for GMed during functional tasks, and two evaluated GMax (see figure 4). Only one variable was found to significantly differ, with limited evidence indicating increased average GMax activity during stair descent (one HQ study35), with a medium ES (0.80, 0.16 to 1.44).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%