2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Circulating Tumor Cell Capture Ability of a Slit Filter-Based Method in Comparison to a Selection-Free Method in Multiple Cancer Types

Abstract: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a promising biomarker for cancer liquid biopsy. To evaluate the CTC capture bias and detection capability of the slit filter-based CTC isolation platform (CTC-FIND), we prospectively compared it head to head to a selection-free platform (AccuCyte®-CyteFinder® system). We used the two methods to determine the CTC counts, CTC positive rates, CTC size distributions, and CTC phenotypes in 36 patients with metastatic cancer. Between the two methods, the median CTC counts were not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible for smaller MCCC's and many CTC's to be falsely binned as white blood cells, since the average cell diameters of CTC's fall within the 10 -15µm range. [35][36][37] A recent review also stated that microfluidic channel size can induce critical flow velocities resulting in shearing and disaggregation of CTC clusters. [18,38] Another review by Amintas et al concluded that individual CTC isolation techniques are typically not compatible with CTC cluster isolation.…”
Section: Current Tumor Cell Isolation Methods From Whole Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible for smaller MCCC's and many CTC's to be falsely binned as white blood cells, since the average cell diameters of CTC's fall within the 10 -15µm range. [35][36][37] A recent review also stated that microfluidic channel size can induce critical flow velocities resulting in shearing and disaggregation of CTC clusters. [18,38] Another review by Amintas et al concluded that individual CTC isolation techniques are typically not compatible with CTC cluster isolation.…”
Section: Current Tumor Cell Isolation Methods From Whole Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current that arose from redox cycling of pAP and its oxidized form, p-quinone imine (pQI), noticeably increased over time at a rate correlated to the expression level of the target cell surface antigen. Instead of capturing cells based on immunoaffinity, [62][63] or size, [64][65][66][67] we leveraged the dielectrophoretic properties of these cells for capture. These results are significant because they demonstrate the advantages of combining IDBPEs with DEP for multiple cell capture and analysis.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a study involving multiple cancer types, including RCC, compared two capture platforms: one based on the slit filter (CTC-FIND) and another based on free selection (AccuCyte ® -CyteFinder ® system) [69]. A significantly higher positive CTC rate (91.7%) was found using the CTC-FIND platform compared to the AccuCyte ® -CyteFinder ® system (66.7%).…”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that the CTC-FIND platform has a superior ability to capture positive CTCs, however of larger size. A warning was issued concerning the bias related to a higher preponderance of prostate cancer cases contributing to the results obtained and the small size of the sample used [69].…”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%