2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the coefficient of friction at the workpiece-tool interface in milling of high strength compacted graphite cast irons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 2, coating thickness, friction coefficient and wear rate values of non-boronized and boronized samples are given. When the wear tests of steels are examined in the literature, the coefficient of friction changes between 0.5 -0.7 [42,43,44] and this shows that this study is consistent with the literature. On the other hand, surface investigators such as Kovaci et al [16], Cuao-Moreu et al [45], Teng et al [46] and He et al [47] have studied the tribological properties of metal specimens by coating different metal surfaces with different materials, temperature, time and method.…”
Section: Wear Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In Table 2, coating thickness, friction coefficient and wear rate values of non-boronized and boronized samples are given. When the wear tests of steels are examined in the literature, the coefficient of friction changes between 0.5 -0.7 [42,43,44] and this shows that this study is consistent with the literature. On the other hand, surface investigators such as Kovaci et al [16], Cuao-Moreu et al [45], Teng et al [46] and He et al [47] have studied the tribological properties of metal specimens by coating different metal surfaces with different materials, temperature, time and method.…”
Section: Wear Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The machining center was adapted as an open tribometer, in a similar confi guration of that used by Silva, Ruzzi et al 17 . Before each trial, the workpiece was pre-machined to and Rz = 2.515 ± 0.220 μm, ensuring a similar tribosystem for each repetition.…”
Section: Machining Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All simulations have been conducted in 50 steps. Shear friction factor has been defined equal to 0.8, 35 and convective heat transfer coefficient for dry machining equal to 11 W/m 2 K. 36 The formulation method that has been used for the simulations was Lagrangian incremental method since machining operations, like face milling, include discontinuous effects, such as chip formation, and are not steady-state operations. 37 The material of the work piece that has been chosen in the FEM simulations was CGI 450.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%