Analysis of the Coupling Effect and Space-Time Difference between China’s Digital Economy Development and Carbon Emissions Reduction

Abstract

Previously conducted studies have established that the digital economy has a one-way inhibition effect on carbon emissions. Against this background, this paper aims to analyze the coordinated development effect of the interaction between the digital economy and carbon emissions reduction. The entropy weight method, coupling and coordination degree model, Dagum Gini coefficient and Moran’s I index have been carried out as research methods in this paper. The results showed that: (1) The coupling and coordination of China’s digital economy and carbon emissions reduction shows an overall growth trend, but the coupling and coordination among regions, provinces and cities show a large imbalance. (2) In the sample period, the overall difference in the coupling and coordination between digital economy development and carbon emissions reduction shows an expanding trend, and the overall difference results are attributed to regional differences. (3) There is a significant spatial correlation in the coupling and coordination degree of digital economy development and carbon emissions reduction among cities. The paper systematically grasps the status of coupling and coordination development, the source of difference and spatial correlation between the digital economy and carbon reduction in Chinese cities. A dependence relationship has been established, which is digital economy development and carbon emissions reduction, and an interactive promotion pattern has been revealed between the digital economic system and the carbon emissions reduction system.

Can Government Environmental Auditing Help to Improve Environmental Quality? Evidence from China

“…Cole [44] chose 10 air and water pollutants; He et al [51] selected three of the most important pollutants in the air: total suspending particles, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxide; Zhang et al [52] also selected three indicators: industrial sulfur dioxide emissions, industrial smoke (powder) dust emissions, and days with air quality above grade II; Sharif [54] used CO 2 , N 2 O, CH 4 , and ecological footprint; Feng [64] selected the total wastewater discharges, ammonia nitrogen emissions, chemical-oxygen demand (COD) emissions, total nitrogen emissions, total phosphorus emissions, sulfur dioxide emissions, oxide emissions, and soot and dust emissions as indicators; Saghaian [65] used N 2 O and CH 4 emissions and Feng [64] selected wastewater discharges and exhaust emissions as proxies for the environmental quality. In addition, some scholars evaluated environmental quality from the perspective of carbon emissions [66,67].…”

Evolutionary Simulation of Carbon-Neutral Behavior of Urban Citizens in a “Follow–Drive” Perspective

“…In response to the impacts of climate change, almost 200 countries have signed the Paris Agreement with the goal of achieving net zero emissions by the second half of this century [1]. As the world's largest energy consumer and carbon emitter, China accounts for about 1/3 of the world's total carbon dioxide emissions [2]. Therefore, China's effectiveness in reducing emissions is widely regarded as a crucial factor in the effort to limit the global average temperature increase to 1.5 • C, which is a key requirement for effectively implementing the Paris Agreement [3].…”