“…For example, Park and Tae [ 20 ] compared the housing policies of 10 countries on three aspects related to the quality of housing and offered policy suggestions to improve the quality of housing in Korea. Other studies include an evaluation of the scores and status of housing under the certification system for long-life housing in Korea [ 21 ], an evaluation of the lifecycle CO 2 emission reduction of long-life apartment housing in Korea [ 8 ], the development of regulations for Taiwan’s sustainable building (open building) [ 22 ], and a survey of stakeholders’ preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing in the UK [ 23 ]. In addition, a similar housing concept (e.g., sustainable housing) has also been studied from various perspectives, but the focus has been on design [ 24 , 25 ], affordability [ 26 , 27 ], community [ 28 , 29 ], urban construction [ 30 , 31 ], climate change mitigation [ 32 ], and energy savings and consumption [ 33 , 34 ].…”