2011
DOI: 10.1115/1.4003469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Dynamic Response of a Controlled Detonation Chamber

Abstract: Detonation chambers (either mobile or fixed) are used worldwide for a wide range of applications. At present, a 1/7 scale model of a 1 ton detonation chamber is available for extended testing in Belgium. The chamber is a single wall cylindrical vessel with semielliptical ends. Each time an explosive charge is fired in the vessel, that vessel is submitted to a number of deformation cycles. A series of strain gauges measures the deformation of the vessel walls. Experimental peak strains and vibration frequency c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All previous conclusions are also in good agreement with numerical simulations [7]. Numerical simulations with Ansys Autodyn R [8] showed that the influence of the charge shape depends on the distance from the charge.…”
Section: Influence Of the Charge Shapesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…All previous conclusions are also in good agreement with numerical simulations [7]. Numerical simulations with Ansys Autodyn R [8] showed that the influence of the charge shape depends on the distance from the charge.…”
Section: Influence Of the Charge Shapesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Without considering the effect of multiple convergence and reflection of shock wave, the impact load on the vessel wall is simplified as triangular wave pulse ( ) uniformly distributed on the inner wall of the vessel [14]. Where:…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Cylindrical Shells With Different Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this is the lack of full-field cyclic displacement and strain information that will convince designers to adopt shakedown criteria as a safe-state beyond first-yield, which is the focus of this article. Notable exceptions where shakedown designs are utilized include: vessels for demilitarization of munitions [8,9], tribology [10][11][12], multilayer semiconductor devices [13], pavement design [14,15], shape memory alloy components [16,17], and nuclear pressure vessels [1][2][3][4][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%