2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effect of liquid droplet models on the reflood heat transfer using the CUPID code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 illustrates the most influential physical model STD analysis, specifically for the C38, corresponding to the SFB heat transfer model in Table 2. This result is consistent with the outcome of previous study [25,26,40], indicating that the film boiling heat transfer is the most crucial physical model in the reflooding phenomena simulation. In addition, the interfacial friction factor for inverted annular flow, slug flow, and interphase heat transfer coefficients for stratified and annular to stratified transition also strongly contribute to this UQ analysis using STD evaluation (see Figure 11).…”
Section: Sensitive Physical Model Investigation Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Figure 11 illustrates the most influential physical model STD analysis, specifically for the C38, corresponding to the SFB heat transfer model in Table 2. This result is consistent with the outcome of previous study [25,26,40], indicating that the film boiling heat transfer is the most crucial physical model in the reflooding phenomena simulation. In addition, the interfacial friction factor for inverted annular flow, slug flow, and interphase heat transfer coefficients for stratified and annular to stratified transition also strongly contribute to this UQ analysis using STD evaluation (see Figure 11).…”
Section: Sensitive Physical Model Investigation Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%