2014
DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-7665-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the effect of water activity on ice formation using a new thermodynamic framework

Abstract: Abstract. In this work a new thermodynamic framework is developed and used to investigate the effect of water activity on the formation of ice within supercooled droplets. The new framework is based on a novel concept where the interface is assumed to be made of liquid molecules "trapped" by the solid matrix. It also accounts for the change in the composition of the liquid phase upon nucleation. Using this framework, new expressions are developed for the critical ice germ size and the nucleation work with expl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent MD simulations showing the existence of a low-density region around the ice germ support the NNF model (Singh and Bagchi, 2014). Introducing NNF into CNT and correcting the nucleation work for mixing effects resulted in good agreement of predicted J hom with experimental results (Barahona, 2014). NNF was also shown to be consistent with the water activity criterion.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Recent MD simulations showing the existence of a low-density region around the ice germ support the NNF model (Singh and Bagchi, 2014). Introducing NNF into CNT and correcting the nucleation work for mixing effects resulted in good agreement of predicted J hom with experimental results (Barahona, 2014). NNF was also shown to be consistent with the water activity criterion.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…MD results, however, suggest that the properties of water in the vicinity of the ice germ differ from the bulk, casting doubt on such an approach (e.g., Kawasaki and Tanaka, 2010;Singh and Bagchi, 2014). Unlike for the interfacial energy where several theoretical models have been proposed (e.g., Spaepen, 1975;Digilov, 2004;Barahona, 2014), the theoretical treatment of G act has been limited. One possible reason is that interface transfer is associated with random fluctuations near the ice-liquid interface and is therefore difficult to treat in terms of macroscopic variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations