“…CNT provides a framework to understand ice nucleation and has been instrumental in the development of parameterizations from experimental data (e.g., Pruppacher and Klett, 1997;Khvorostyanov and Curry, 2009;Murray et al, 2010). On the other hand, J hom estimated with CNT and using independent estimates of thermodynamic parameters typically results in stark disagreement with measurements (Pruppacher and Klett, 1997;Kawasaki and Tanaka, 2010;Barahona, 2014). Thus, CNT is commonly used semiempirically, fitting several parameters of the theory, most commonly the liquidice interfacial tension, σ iw , and the activation energy, G act , to measured nucleation rates (e.g., Jeffery and Austin, 1997;Khvorostyanov and Curry, 2004;Murray et al, 2010;Ickes et al, 2015).…”