2014
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2014.996920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Effect of Provisional Ties on the Construction and Current Deformation of Mallorca Cathedral

Abstract: This paper presents the analysis of the structure of Mallorca Cathedral taking into account the influence on structural behaviour of auxiliary iron ties used during the construction process. Recent studies have presented some hypotheses about the construction process of the cathedral. The present study complements the previous results by considering the use of auxiliary ties as temporary stabilizing device during the construction.Evidence of the use of ties during the construction has been recognized after a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even more meaningful is the comparison in terms of stresses: in the specific case of this study the peak compressive stresses obtained are approximately 6 times higher in the first modeling (starting from the undeformed configuration) than in the second one (starting from the deformed configuration). This confirms the significant risks previously put forward: the procedures that see a direct and automatic relationship between the surveyed geometrical model and the virtual model for the numerical structural analysis run the risk of a substantial overestimation of the safety level, as well as of a limited effectiveness in representing and understanding the present situation and the path that lead to it (Pelà et al 2006).…”
Section: The Results Of the Numerical Structural Modelssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even more meaningful is the comparison in terms of stresses: in the specific case of this study the peak compressive stresses obtained are approximately 6 times higher in the first modeling (starting from the undeformed configuration) than in the second one (starting from the deformed configuration). This confirms the significant risks previously put forward: the procedures that see a direct and automatic relationship between the surveyed geometrical model and the virtual model for the numerical structural analysis run the risk of a substantial overestimation of the safety level, as well as of a limited effectiveness in representing and understanding the present situation and the path that lead to it (Pelà et al 2006).…”
Section: The Results Of the Numerical Structural Modelssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…But an existing buildingand therefore also the individual components that constitute ithas already undergone, in time, numerous modifications: earthquakes, settlements, material deformation, are in fact among the factors that most commonly modify the original shape and transform the building into what the eye (and tools) see today, modifying at the same time what is not seen, i.e. the state of internal stress of the material (Roca, 2005;Pelà et al, 2006;Coisson et al, 2013). The reduction of processing times that ensues from an automated approach makes it very attractive, but in the context of structures that have considerable structural deformations, a non-critical analysis of the data of the survey may however be a source of a wrong interpretation of the shapes that are currently visible and of the real structural conditions.…”
Section: The Risks Of An Automated Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model can account for irreversible deformations through a simple and efficient algorithm, within the context of continuum damage mechanics. The above properties, as well as the limited number of involved material parameters and the simple explicit formulation, make it a suitable model for the seismic analysis of large concrete and masonry structures [34,35,36,37].…”
Section: Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples that could be cited include, in France, the flying buttresses of the Church of Saint Urbain de Troyes [13] ( Figure 2B), where the red points (A and C) are the starting points of the two arches, and between which the unevenness of the flying buttress must be bridged, and those of the Cathedral of Beauvais, which alternate a first line of ramps of a single arch of circumference with another of two arches ( Figure 3A) [14]. In Spain, for example, there are the original flying buttresses of the cathedral of Palma de Mallorca, made up of two rampant arches of one and two circumferential arches, integrated into a single flying buttress ( Figure 3B) [15]. The rampant arches consisting of two circumferential arches The flying buttresses appeared for the first time in Durham Cathedral around the year 1100 as an evolution of the hidden buttress in the triforium, where an opening is made that allows a longitudinal route parallel to the main nave [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%