2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-017-2029-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the electroviscous effects on pressure-driven flow in nanochannels using effective ionic concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many studies dedicated to understanding the ionic transport through nanofluidic systems. The majority of these theoretical analyses examined the attenuating effect of conduction current on flow rate by an apparent increase in the viscosity as “electroviscous effect”, which was found to reduce the ionic transport. Electroviscosity increases with an increased overlap of EDL from opposing surfaces that decrease salt concentration and/or by decrease confinement height reducing the ionic current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many studies dedicated to understanding the ionic transport through nanofluidic systems. The majority of these theoretical analyses examined the attenuating effect of conduction current on flow rate by an apparent increase in the viscosity as “electroviscous effect”, which was found to reduce the ionic transport. Electroviscosity increases with an increased overlap of EDL from opposing surfaces that decrease salt concentration and/or by decrease confinement height reducing the ionic current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these theoretical analyses examined the attenuating effect of conduction current on flow rate by an apparent increase in the viscosity as “electroviscous effect”, which was found to reduce the ionic transport. Electroviscosity increases with an increased overlap of EDL from opposing surfaces that decrease salt concentration and/or by decrease confinement height reducing the ionic current. Researchers employed the Debye–Hückel parameter ( H/λ ) to quantify electroviscosity effects. , Increase in surface zeta potential causes electroviscosity to increase until the zeta potential reaches a threshold above which EDL becomes thin and electroviscosity becomes negligible .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature suggests that the electric double layer is the most dominant surface interaction for this mechanism, while the zeta potential at both rock/brine and brine/oil interfaces directly affects the volume of trapped oil released from the rock 23 , 24 . Other pertaining issues with literature in electrokinetic flow are the predominant assumptions of steady-state flow during transport and microchannels having infinite lengths 25 32 . Such assumptions do not allow the understanding of the effect of charges present at the inlet and exit of the microchannel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such assumptions do not allow the understanding of the effect of charges present at the inlet and exit of the microchannel. Moreover, the assumption of an infinite microchannel enables the assumption of only radial change in ion concentration, using the one-dimensional Poisson–Boltzmann equation, and ignores the variation of ion concentration in the axial direction, which can be studied using the extended Nernst–Planck equations 32 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have investigated electroviscous influences in the periodical flow of power-law liquid in a rectangular microfluidic device Hsu et al (2016). have numerical explored the electrokinetics in the silica channels using three EDL models like Gouy-Chapman (GC), Basic stern (BS), and Viscoelectric (VE) models Kim and Kim (2018). have studied the flow through nanochannels using effective ion concentration and quantified the electro-viscosity effects in terms of a newly introduced parameter (ratio of ζ potential to D-H parameter) Jing et al (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%