2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the excavation damaged zone around a tunnel accounting for geostress and unloading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] In most rock masses, multiple sets of joints have been encountered. [16][17][18][19] In most rock masses, multiple sets of joints have been encountered.…”
Section: Yang Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16][17][18][19] In most rock masses, multiple sets of joints have been encountered. [16][17][18][19] In most rock masses, multiple sets of joints have been encountered.…”
Section: Yang Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field evidence has shown that damage of a jointed rock mass is a time-dependent behavior accompanied by the joint opening, closing, and extension. [16][17][18][19] In most rock masses, multiple sets of joints have been encountered. Depending on their relative scale compared with the structure, the joints can be analyzed in different ways.…”
Section: Yang Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of geotechnical problems is rather wide. The majority of investigations are dedicated to the estimations of stress-strain state around the underground tunnels or excavations with analytical [Chanyshev et al, 2014;Demin et al, 2015;Lu and Yang, 2013] and numerical [Kiya et al, 2015;Pardoen et al, 2012;Roatesi, 2010;Yang et al, 2014] solutions of boundary problem. The results of these estimations provide a good information about disintegration of rocks around the excavations and/or tunnels due to plastic deformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://elpub.wdcb.ru/journals/rjes/doi/2016ES000574-res.html our mind, the most interesting papers concern the temporal mechanical behavior of rock mass with excavations as soon as it supposes the investigation of stability of development workings, rock mass elements (roof and floor) and the influence of rock pressure manifestation during mining [Khoshboresh, 2013;Nuric et al, 2012;Pavlova et al, 2004;Shabanimashcool, 2012]. The stability and/or development of inelastic strains/fracture around the underground openings is usually considered as the boundary problem of the media with tunnel of circle or other cross-section form subjected to multi-axial loading [Pardoen et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2014;Zhu et al, 2005]. The lack of papers is observed concerning the problem of modeling the excavation at coal face moving [Kwasniewski, 2008;Verma et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of excavation damaged zone around tunnel under geo-stress environment involves a coupled damage evolution process, whose main mechanism is growth of cracks owing to unloading and stress redistribution apart from blasting [41]. Loading stiffness and stress distribution in the surrounding rock mass, resulting in both stable and unstable shear failures along discontinuities as the excavation proceeds, influence the stability of underground workings apart from ground vibrations generated due to blasting [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%