2005
DOI: 10.2143/ast.35.1.583164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Expected Shortfall of Aggregate Dependent Risks

Abstract: We consider d identically and continuously distributed dependent risks X 1 , …, X d . Our main result is a theorem on the asymptotic behaviour of expected shortfall for the aggregate risks: there is a constant c d such that for large u we haveMoreover we study diversification effects in two dimensions, similar to our Value-at-Risk studies in [2].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Wüthrich (2003) and Alink et al (2004Alink et al ( , 2005, this paper considers the behavior of P(S > t) for large values of t when the claims exhibit extreme-value behavior and are dependent. As shown by these authors, the problem is of relevance to risk managers and actuaries who wish to estimate, e.g., the Value-at-Risk (VaR) associated with S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following Wüthrich (2003) and Alink et al (2004Alink et al ( , 2005, this paper considers the behavior of P(S > t) for large values of t when the claims exhibit extreme-value behavior and are dependent. As shown by these authors, the problem is of relevance to risk managers and actuaries who wish to estimate, e.g., the Value-at-Risk (VaR) associated with S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I or not. In their papers, Wüthrich (2003) and Alink et al (2004Alink et al ( , 2005 consider this question in the special case where D is Archimedean, which means (see, e.g., MacKay 1986 or Nelsen 1999, Chapter 4) that there exists a func-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof follows in a similar manner to the one of Theorem 3.1 of Alink et al (2005). Due to (7) and (11), F ∈ S M DA(Λ) implies that the df of S 0 (T ) belongs to M DA(Λ) and furthermore…”
Section: Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 72%