2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Forbush Decreases and Ground‐Level Enhancement on September 2017 Using Neutron Spectrometers Operated in Antarctic and Midlatitude Stations

Abstract: This work investigates solar events occurred in September 2017 characterized by a series of Forbush decreases and a ground level enhancement (GLE). Forbush decreases is a rapid decrease in the observed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_cosmic_ray intensity following a coronal mass ejection while GLE is induced by a strong solar event for which the flux of high‐energy solar particles is sufficient to enhance the radiation level on the ground. These investigations were performed using data recorded by a neu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller increases are more common at stations closer to sea‐level at non‐polar latitudes that have to compete with geomagnetic shielding as well as atmospheric shielding. Varying cut‐off rigidities can influence the detection and intensity of GLEs together with other factors such as Forbush decreases (e.g., GLE 72 occurred toward the end of a Forbush decrease where count rates were still suppressed (Hubert et al., 2019), and GLE 67 occurred during a Forbush decrease following GLE 66 (Mishev et al., 2021).…”
Section: Neutron Monitor Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller increases are more common at stations closer to sea‐level at non‐polar latitudes that have to compete with geomagnetic shielding as well as atmospheric shielding. Varying cut‐off rigidities can influence the detection and intensity of GLEs together with other factors such as Forbush decreases (e.g., GLE 72 occurred toward the end of a Forbush decrease where count rates were still suppressed (Hubert et al., 2019), and GLE 67 occurred during a Forbush decrease following GLE 66 (Mishev et al., 2021).…”
Section: Neutron Monitor Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Hubert et al. (2019) and Hubert (2024) found a different response to solar events for neutrons of different energies. Hence, for the correction of neutron intensities for incoming radiation in the scope of CRNS, it may not be sufficient to scale the neutron monitor response to different cutoff rigidities and atmospheric shielding depths only (Hawdon et al., 2014; McJannet & Desilets, 2023), but also to account for the different response of low‐energy neutron detectors and neutron monitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sometimes solar flares with increased flux of charged particles flowing towards the Earth deflect protons of the galactic component of the primary cosmic radiation and therefore decrease neutron flux of the secondary cosmic radiation in the atmosphere. Such events are called Forbush decreases and may lower neutron flux by more than 20 % ( 20 , 21 ). A case in point are our M1, M2, M4, and M6 measurements taken on the Belgrade–Dortmund flights at different times and therefore solar activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%