2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2270117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the fractures of metallic materials using optical coherence tomography

Abstract: Forensic in situ investigations, for example for aviation, maritime, road, or rail accidents would benefit from a method that may allow to distinguish ductile from brittle fractures of metals -as material defects are one of the potential causes of such accidents. Currently, the gold standard in material studies is represented by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). However, SEM are large, lab-based systems, therefore in situ measurements are excluded. In addition, they are expensive and time-consuming. We have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last two decades, new innovative 3D surface topological scanning microscopy has been developed with the potential to improve physical matching. Different 3D acquisition systems, employing 3D laser scanners, optical coherence tomography, stylus scanning instruments, and confocal microscopy, have been utilized for forensic evidence identification applications [19,26,29‐43]. Automated surface acquisition and matching processes utilizing 3D topography data have demonstrated promising improvements in the objectivity of the comparison process [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, new innovative 3D surface topological scanning microscopy has been developed with the potential to improve physical matching. Different 3D acquisition systems, employing 3D laser scanners, optical coherence tomography, stylus scanning instruments, and confocal microscopy, have been utilized for forensic evidence identification applications [19,26,29‐43]. Automated surface acquisition and matching processes utilizing 3D topography data have demonstrated promising improvements in the objectivity of the comparison process [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, the transition from 2D imaging to 3D surface topological scanning has provided support for the physical matching examination. Different forensic evidence surfaces including 3D tool marks, firearm, bullets, or fractured/ torn can be acquired for forensic matching applications using 3D laser scan [104,105,108], optical coherence tomography for in situ forensic investigations [113], optical microscopy [114], 3D laser or light microscopy [107,111], stylus scanning instrument [106,110], and confocal microscopy [109,112]. One of the benefits of the 3D representation is that after the 3D surface acquisition process, multiple shared examinations and analyses can be done on the digital data at different laboratories without transporting the forensic evidence [111],…”
Section: Microscopic Examination Of Fracture Surface Topology For Forensic Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%