1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0260-8774(98)00169-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the heat transfer coefficient during potato frying

Abstract: The objective of this work was to study the dependence of the heat transfer coecient (h) on the water loss rate of potato during frying. An indirect method was used where a metal piece with the same geometry of the potato pieces was placed on top of various potato samples at dierent frying times, and its temperature was recorded for 20±30 s. Another method consisted of direct recording of the temperature within a potato slice, close to the surface. Water loss rate was estimated by image analysis of bubbles. Af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A parameter that could cause variation in water loss is the increasing oil flow rate, which should positively affect the external convective heat transfer coefficient. However, most of the heat transfer will take place in the boiling phase during which water is evaporating and at that moment the heat transfer coefficient is dominated by the local turbulence close to the surface of the fry, induced by vapour bubble formation (Costa et al 1999;Farkas and Hubbard 2000). Similar values for the moisture content are found in literature studies in the absence of forced convective oil flow (Krokida et al 2000(Krokida et al , 2001Van Koerten et al 2015).…”
Section: Quality Distributionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A parameter that could cause variation in water loss is the increasing oil flow rate, which should positively affect the external convective heat transfer coefficient. However, most of the heat transfer will take place in the boiling phase during which water is evaporating and at that moment the heat transfer coefficient is dominated by the local turbulence close to the surface of the fry, induced by vapour bubble formation (Costa et al 1999;Farkas and Hubbard 2000). Similar values for the moisture content are found in literature studies in the absence of forced convective oil flow (Krokida et al 2000(Krokida et al , 2001Van Koerten et al 2015).…”
Section: Quality Distributionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Costa et al (1999) showed that the heat transfer coefficient values were up to two times greater during water vapour bubbling and they varied with the rate of loss of water from the product. Further, a maximum value of heat transfer coefficient was observed around the time when the rate of water loss was maximum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose (i.e., boiling regime), the convective heat transfer coefficient depends on the evaporation flux. Costa [9] proposed a linear correlation between the coefficient of convection and steam flow:…”
Section: Modeling Of Thermal Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several parameters, such as the hydrodynamic regime in the solid-oil interface, geometry of the product, and temperature difference between frying oil and product surface, control the convective transfer. One of the most important mechanisms combining the different heat and mass transfer in frying is the hydrodynamic regime due to the boiling [9]. This hydrodynamic regime is more or less intense according to the flow of water vapor released around the product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%