1995
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(94)00321-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the heat transfer coefficient in a turbulent particle pipe flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of these investigations focused on the heat transfer between the two phases or the modulation of heat transfer efficiency at the solid walls [24][25][26][27]. Some research results showed that the heat transfer rate increases with the addition of particles at high mass loadings, whereas at low mass loadings, the heat transfer rate decreases [28]. Furthermore, while large particles increase the heat transfer coefficient, small particles have a negligible impact on the heat transfer coefficient or even decrease it [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The majority of these investigations focused on the heat transfer between the two phases or the modulation of heat transfer efficiency at the solid walls [24][25][26][27]. Some research results showed that the heat transfer rate increases with the addition of particles at high mass loadings, whereas at low mass loadings, the heat transfer rate decreases [28]. Furthermore, while large particles increase the heat transfer coefficient, small particles have a negligible impact on the heat transfer coefficient or even decrease it [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The average heat transfer coefficient is also a function of particle size, particle loading ratio, and suspension Reynolds number, which is a measure of the particles' residence time in the heated pipe. Avila and Cervantes (1995) verified that for a vertical pipe with constant wall temperature large particles (200 mm) do not increase heat transfer, whereas small particles (70 and 140 mm) cause a linear increase in the heat transfer coefficient. It was found that for variable loading ratios there are two effects that combine to modify h susp , turbulence and suspension heat capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…On the other hand, when the Reynolds number ¼ 26,500 the effect of increased heat capacity is not significant (small particle residence time), so that the turbulence modulation promotes a decrease in h susp . Concerning loading ratios greater than 1, Avila and Cervantes (1995) verified that for a vertical pipe with constant wall temperature, an increase in the heat capacity of the suspension is the primary factor that promotes an increase in the average heat transfer coefficient. There is disagreement as to how small particles affect heat transfer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A larger solids' loading ratio results in a higher heat transfer coefficient from the hot wall to the gas-solids dense phase flow [42]. Although the overlap of data ranges is limited, the results have been compared with those of Avila et al [43] and Moriyama et al [40]. …”
Section: Mass Flow Rate Measurement Of Solids Based On Thermal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%