2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the impact of sampling on NetFlow traffic classification

Abstract: The traffic classification problem has recently attracted the interest of both network operators and researchers. Several machine learning (ML) methods have been proposed in the literature as a promising solution to this problem. Surprisingly, very few works have studied the traffic classification problem with Sampled NetFlow data. However, Sampled NetFlow is a widely extended monitoring solution among network operators. In this paper we aim to fulfill this gap. First, we analyze the performance of current ML … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
113
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
8
113
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, the L7 Filter signatures have been popular within the traffic classification community. During the same period, researchers requiring a free deep packet inspection Dots Per Inch (DPI) tool to provide ground truth data for testing and evaluating classification techniques, found that L7 Filter was the only feasible option (Grajzer et al, 2012;Dong et al, 2013;Carela-Espanol et al, 2011).…”
Section: L7 Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the L7 Filter signatures have been popular within the traffic classification community. During the same period, researchers requiring a free deep packet inspection Dots Per Inch (DPI) tool to provide ground truth data for testing and evaluating classification techniques, found that L7 Filter was the only feasible option (Grajzer et al, 2012;Dong et al, 2013;Carela-Espanol et al, 2011).…”
Section: L7 Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this comparison, we chose the J48 technique as a representative example of batch-oriented techniques, which is an open source version of the C4.5 decision tree implemented in WEKA. We selected this technique because it has been widely used for network traffic classification [5,6,12,29], achieving very good results when compared with other techniques [4,30]. Usually ML-based network traffic classification solutions presented in the literature are evaluated from a static point of view using limited datasets.…”
Section: Hoeffding Adaptive Tree Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-the-art proposals for traffic classification are usually based on Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) or Machine Learning (ML) techniques [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. These techniques extract in an offline phase a set of patterns, rules or models that capture a static view of a particular network and moment of time from a training dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we do not provide a new sampling technique we just highlight the long history of sampling dating back to mathematical work on statistics over many decades. For a focused introduction we refer to work of Claffy et al [31] (general overview), Carela-Español et al [32] (study of sampling influence for traffic analysis), Braun et al [13], who recently implemented an adaptive sampling within a monitoring system to mitigate tail dropping behaviour within the overloaded system, and referenced in there.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%