1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3908(97)00044-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Ligand Binding Site of the 5-HT 3 Receptor Using Site Directed Mutagenesis: Importance of Glutamate 106

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
50
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that radioligand binding was completely ablated when Glu-129 was replaced with the chemically similar aspartate, yet the receptors reached the membrane, we propose that this residue is critical for the local structure of the binding pocket. Our data are somewhat surprising given previous experiments that reported both radioligand binding (of a different antagonist GR65630) and function of an E129D mutant 5-HT 3 receptor (Glu-106 by their numbering) (35). These authors reported poor expression of Glu-129 mutants (E129A and E129Q receptors expressed too poorly to characterize them) and used a different splice variant of the receptor, which might explain these differences.…”
Section: Fig 2 Representative Examples Of the Three Model Typescontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Given that radioligand binding was completely ablated when Glu-129 was replaced with the chemically similar aspartate, yet the receptors reached the membrane, we propose that this residue is critical for the local structure of the binding pocket. Our data are somewhat surprising given previous experiments that reported both radioligand binding (of a different antagonist GR65630) and function of an E129D mutant 5-HT 3 receptor (Glu-106 by their numbering) (35). These authors reported poor expression of Glu-129 mutants (E129A and E129Q receptors expressed too poorly to characterize them) and used a different splice variant of the receptor, which might explain these differences.…”
Section: Fig 2 Representative Examples Of the Three Model Typescontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In the AChBP and, by inference, the other members of the cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel family, the ligand-binding domain is at the interface between subunits and is made up of a series of six domains (A-F), three from one subunit (A-C), and three from the adjacent subunit (D-F) (Brejc et al, 2001;Celie et al, 2004). Consistent with this notion, studies from several laboratories have identified a number of residues at or near the 5-HT 3 R ligand-binding site (Boess et al, 1997;Hope et al, 1999;Yan et al, 1999;Spier and Lummis, 2000;Venkataraman et al, 2002;Yan and White, 2002;Schreiter et al, 2003;Price and Lummis, 2004) that are located in the various binding-site domains in the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Initial radioligand binding studies were performed by MDS Pharma Services (Bothell, WA) as previously described for serotonin receptor subtypes 1A, 1B, 2B, 2C, 3, 5A, 6, 7, serotonin transporter [5,6,8,23,31,32,[37][38][39][40][41][43][44][45]47]. Significant binding affinity was only observed at the 5-HT 5a receptor (>50%) for the PE and DCM extracts at a concentration of 50 μg/ml [12].…”
Section: Serotonin Receptor Binding Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%