Analysis of the list of medicines for arterial hypertension therapy during pregnancy

Abstract

Preserving the pregnant women health is one of the most important task in the health care system. In 2020, more than 21,000 cases of hypertensive disorders were diagnosed during pregnancy in Ukraine. Arterial hypertension during pregnancy is the main risk factor for negative consequences for the child and mother. During pregnancy, antihypertensive therapy reduces the risk of morbidity or premature birth, as well as adverse effects to the fetus/newborn.
 The purpose of the study was to analyze the list of registered antihypertensive medicines under the INN, which are presented on the domestic pharmaceutical market, and to analyze their socio-economic availability.
 Research materials and methods. Analysis of antihypertensive medicines in accordance with national recommendations for the arterial hypertension treatment during pregnancy in Ukraine; analysis of the State Register of Medicinal Products of Ukraine, the National List of Essential Medicines, the State Formulary of Medicines (15 issue). Data from the information resource «Tabletki.ua» were used to determine the pharmaceuticals prices. Methods – information search, analysis, generalization, marketing research, «minimization of cost» method, calculation of socio-economic affordability ratios – the liquidity ratio Cliq, the ratio of adequacy solvency Ca.s.
 The results of the analysis of antihypertensive medicines that are registered and have indications during pregnancy showed that the following medicines with INNs are available on the pharmaceutical market: methyldopa, nifedipine, metoprolol tartrate, esmolol, nicardipine, uradipyl, but the following INNs labetalol, hydralazine, acebutolol, mepindolol, oxprenolol are missing. It was established that the list of antihypertensive medicines used during pregnancy is represented by 33 trade names of various medicinal forms from 10 countries of the world, the specific weight of which is 69% of medicines of foreign production. There is an insufficient amount of methyldopa medicines on the domestic pharmaceutical market, as there is only one name of a foreign manufacturer.
 It was determined by the «cost minimization» method that the costs for one month of treatment when using nifedipine of a domestic manufacturer compared to a drug of a foreign manufacturer are lower by 90%. For metoprolol of the domestic manufacturer, the costs are 73% lower than for the imported drug.
 The socio-economic availability of medicines was determined using the price liquidity ratio and the solvency adequacy ratio, which indicated relatively adequate price competition and the high availability of most antihypertensive medicines for the population of Ukraine.