2022
DOI: 10.18185/erzifbed.1123429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Molecular Structure of N'-((2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylene)isobutyrohydrazide

Abstract: Bu çalışmada kapalı formülü C15H16N2O2 olan N'-((2-hidroksinaftalin-1-yl)metilen)izobütirohidrazid bileşiğinin moleküler yapısı Yoğunluk Fonksiyonel Teorisi (YFT) hibrid baz fonksiyonlarından B3LYP ve 6-311+G(d, p) baz seti kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. C15H16N2O2 bileşiğinin moleküler yapısı, ilk olarak gaz, kloroform, etanol ve su ortamlarında optimize edilmiştir. Daha sonra optimize edilen moleküler yapılar kullanılarak moleküler elektrostatik potansiyel (MEP) haritası elde edilmiş, farklı çözücü ortamların… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond distance of the C(11)‐O(12) carbonyl group was found as 1.21573 Å in gas<1.22473 Å in methanol<1.22497 A in DMSO<1.22520 Å in water media. These values are close to the values in the literature [26] . The N(14)‐C(16) bond distance in the hydrazine group was found to be 1.288 Å on average, with a double bond character.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bond distance of the C(11)‐O(12) carbonyl group was found as 1.21573 Å in gas<1.22473 Å in methanol<1.22497 A in DMSO<1.22520 Å in water media. These values are close to the values in the literature [26] . The N(14)‐C(16) bond distance in the hydrazine group was found to be 1.288 Å on average, with a double bond character.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The N(14)‐C(16) bond distance in the hydrazine group was found to be 1.288 Å on average, with a double bond character. When these values are compared with the literature, it can be said that the results found are slightly different [26,27] . When the results obtained from gas and solvent environments are compared, it is seen that N(14)‐C(16)‐C(17)‐N(22) and N(14)‐C(16)‐C(23)‐N(28) torsion angles found to be quite different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%