2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12526-017-0661-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the morphological variation of Doryteuthis sanpaulensis (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Argentinian and Brazilian coastal waters using geometric morphometrics techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Dynamic Stasis" in Scaphitid Ammonoids: Clues from Modern Cephalopods, Paleoecology, and Phylogeny.-Modern cephalopods are well known for exhibiting morphological plasticity (Boyle and Rodhouse 2005). This is most often related to differing environmental conditions (ecophenotypy) and/or the development of complicated population structures depending on factors such as dispersal or migration ability regulating gene flow (e.g., Boyle and Boletzky 1996;Pérez-Losada et al 2007;Zaleski et al 2012;Braga et al 2017). These features also figure prominently in the debate surrounding plausible mechanisms for speciation and morphological stasis in the fossil record (e.g., Eldredge et al 2005;Yacobucci 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Dynamic Stasis" in Scaphitid Ammonoids: Clues from Modern Cephalopods, Paleoecology, and Phylogeny.-Modern cephalopods are well known for exhibiting morphological plasticity (Boyle and Rodhouse 2005). This is most often related to differing environmental conditions (ecophenotypy) and/or the development of complicated population structures depending on factors such as dispersal or migration ability regulating gene flow (e.g., Boyle and Boletzky 1996;Pérez-Losada et al 2007;Zaleski et al 2012;Braga et al 2017). These features also figure prominently in the debate surrounding plausible mechanisms for speciation and morphological stasis in the fossil record (e.g., Eldredge et al 2005;Yacobucci 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, a series of angles and linear measurements between two anatomical points would be collected and analysed using multivariate statistics. The traditional morphometrics approach has limitations, such as the loss of information by simplifying the shape and the risk of selecting dimensions that do not adequately represent the actual shape variation (Adams et al 2004;Braga et al 2017). Over the past few decades, geometric morphometrics has been developed as an alternative method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advantages, landmark-based geometric morphometrics has rarely been undertaken for cephalopods and was initially applied to hard structures such as cuttlebone (Neige and Boletzky 1997;Neige 2003), statoliths (Lombarte et al 2006) or more recently beaks (Fang et al 2017;Fang et al 2018). Only in recent years has geometric morphometrics been applied to study squid body shapes (Crespi-Abril et al 2010;Braga et al 2017;Schroeder et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of objects through landmarks allows for the effective extraction of morphological information, resulting in a greater reduction in information loss and a more complete representation of the structure's geometric shape. Furthermore, this method enables the quantification and visualization of morphology, providing a better reflection of morphological changes in species [11,12]. For example, the landmark method has been applied to differentiate Chinese mitten crabs from various water systems [13,14] and to identify morphological similarities and differences between "bathed" and original crabs [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%