2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.161101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the optical conductivity forA2IrO3(A=Na, Li)from first principles

Abstract: We present results for the optical conductivity of Na2IrO3 within density functional theory by including spin-orbit (SO) and correlation effects (U) as implemented in GGA+SO+U. We identify the various interband transitions and show that the underlying quasi-molecular-orbital nature of the electronic structure in Na2IrO3 translates into distinct features in the optical conductivity. Most importantly, the parity of the quasi-molecular orbitals appears to be the main factor in determining strong and weak optical … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
39
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(46 reference statements)
6
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A rather low value of U d ∈ [1.0, 2.0] eV was first suggested by Mazin et al [34], but we argue that a more probable value is U d = 3.0 eV. This value (and J d = 0.6 eV) were used in local density approximation (LDA+U ) computations for Na 2 IrO 3 [35,36] and also for Ba 2 IrO 4 [13]. A similar value of U d = 2.72 eV was obtained by constrained random phase approximation in Na 2 IrO 3 [37].…”
Section: The Hamiltonian Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A rather low value of U d ∈ [1.0, 2.0] eV was first suggested by Mazin et al [34], but we argue that a more probable value is U d = 3.0 eV. This value (and J d = 0.6 eV) were used in local density approximation (LDA+U ) computations for Na 2 IrO 3 [35,36] and also for Ba 2 IrO 4 [13]. A similar value of U d = 2.72 eV was obtained by constrained random phase approximation in Na 2 IrO 3 [37].…”
Section: The Hamiltonian Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same value was used in Refs. [8,34] while slightly smaller (J d = 0.4 eV [13]), very small (J d = 0.14 eV [3]), or larger (J d = 0.6 eV [35,36]) values were also considered. For the sake of fixing precisely Hund's coupling tensor elements J d,µν we use Table I from Ref.…”
Section: The Hamiltonian Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This weak coupling approach naturally explains the zigzag AFM order with a concomitantly induced band gap [36][37][38][39]. However, it is difficult to fully describe the observed excitations in the OC and RIXS for Na 2 IrO 3 [40][41][42]. Because the hopping integral, Coulomb repulsion, and SOC are of similar energy scale, either of these two opposite pictures cannot be ruled out.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitatively, this can be demonstrated by a differential fitting procedure, that builds on a multi Lorentzian model of the equilibrium dielectric function [27]. Both the position and the amplitude of the five oscillators used to reproduce the dielectric function perfectly map the transitions expected in the QMOs picture [24] (for a detailed discussion see Ref. 27).…”
Section: µJ/cmmentioning
confidence: 99%