2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the orbital evolution of space debris using a solar sail and natural forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform numerical simulations, debris located in LEO with initial conditions and identification were used checked in Table 1 We take the re-entry of the debris at an altitude of perigee radius (r_p) less than the Earth radius altitude, approximately 6380 km from the center of the Earth to the surface, plus 120 km where the atmosphere is denser. So it is admitted that below 6500 km of altitude, where the friction with the atmosphere makes re-entry imminent, according to [3][4][5], taking this region as the re-entry zone, represented by the lines red in the r_p evolution graphs over 20 years, in the same way as it was admitted in [5]. All the initial conditions of the simulated debris, in Table 1, are substituted in the disturbing potential and in the equations of orbital motion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To perform numerical simulations, debris located in LEO with initial conditions and identification were used checked in Table 1 We take the re-entry of the debris at an altitude of perigee radius (r_p) less than the Earth radius altitude, approximately 6380 km from the center of the Earth to the surface, plus 120 km where the atmosphere is denser. So it is admitted that below 6500 km of altitude, where the friction with the atmosphere makes re-entry imminent, according to [3][4][5], taking this region as the re-entry zone, represented by the lines red in the r_p evolution graphs over 20 years, in the same way as it was admitted in [5]. All the initial conditions of the simulated debris, in Table 1, are substituted in the disturbing potential and in the equations of orbital motion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motion equations were integrated via Lagrange planetary equations, Equation 1, 2, 3 and 4, which are a system of nonlinear differential equations in Keplerian terms (orbital elements) that describe the motion of bodies orbiting a central body (in this case Earth). In [8], the Lagrange planetary equations restricted to the models are Where M is the average anomaly and R is the perturbing function given in [5], modeled to orbital parameters considering elliptical and inclined orbits, and with reduced degree of freedom, where is the sum of the main forces that perturb the orbital motion of the debris-sail system, represented as In Maple, line graph simulations lasted around 5 hours for plotting individually, using a single GPU capable of 2.3 GHz average processing time over four independent cores (AMD Ryzen 7 3700U). For numerical simulations, values such as mass, equatorial radius, zonal coefficients and mean radius of the Earth, made available by the online platform of NASA "Jet Propulsion Laboratory".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By interpreting these relationships, we can make more accurate orbital predictions and enhance our overall understanding of satellite movements. [19,20].…”
Section: Satellite Dynamics In Geo Graveyard Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%