Imazamox is a chiral herbicide that,
in laboratory experiments
in the dark, exhibits pronounced enantioselective biodegradation in
certain soils. Imazamox also shows rapid photodegradation. However,
which processes are predominant in the field is not clear. We conducted
a set of soil incubation experiments under natural sunlight (and corresponding
dark controls), using enantioselective LC–MS/MS analysis as
a probe to distinguish biodegradation and photodegradation. Under
dark conditions, imazamox was degraded enantioselectively. In contrast,
degradation was nonenantioselective and 2× faster when the soil
was exposed to sunlight, suggesting that biodegradation (in the dark)
and photodegradation (under sunlight) were the predominant degradation
processes. We also investigated the effectiveness of strategies that
were proposed to exclude photodegradation in field studies, covering
of soil with sand or irrigation after herbicide application. The sand
cover did not prevent photodegradation. On the contrary, degradation
was 10× faster than in the dark and nonenantioselective. Computer
simulations supported the explanation that imazamox was transported
upward by capillary flow due to evaporation onto the sand surface,
where it was rapidly photodegraded. Irrigation postponed but not completely
prevented photodegradation. For mobile substances susceptible to photodegradation,
upward transport to the soil surface thus needs to be considered when
deriving rates for biodegradation from field studies.