Analysis of the Prime Minster Abdulla Hamdok’s Speech from Rhetoric and Linguistic Perspective

Hamdan, Ayman Hamd Elneil; Elnadeef, Elsadig Ali Elsadig

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3521870

SSRN Journal

2020

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3521870

|View full text |Cite

Analysis of the Prime Minster Abdulla Hamdok’s Speech from Rhetoric and Linguistic Perspective

Ayman Hamd Elneil Hamdan

Elsadig Ali Elsadig Elnadeef²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

A Critical Discourse Analysis of American and Arabic Political Discourses

Salih¹

2023

J.A.A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study is an attempt to analyze discourse from the CDA perspective. The study aims at answering the following questions: How language use in Trump’s and Alsisi’s speech affected people? Do their speeches have positive or negative implication for the Egyptians people? And what are the discursive strategies used in their speeches?To answer these questions, the study hypothesizes that speakers use different strategies, argumentation and historical background to express their ideologies to listeners to have their supports. Also, it is hypothesized that English and Arabic speakers differ in the ways they make use of these materials.Wodak’s model (1999); the historical discourse approach (DHA), has been chosen to be the model adopted to analyze the data selected. Accordingly, two speeches of the former presidents; Abdul Fatah Assisi, in Khartoum-Sudan in March 6, 2021 and Donald Trump the former president of the United States of America, on Oct 23, 2020 about Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam are selected to be the data of this study. Concentration is going to be on the components of the historic approach including the strategies, the topos, the context and the historical background. Each discourse is analyzed according to these components. At last, the current study finds out that Trump as a speaker uses more topos of danger and that Assisi uses more reference strategy a conclusion which unveils the hidden ideologies of the speakers that Trump is more confident, more powerful and impetuous than Assisi who seems less confident, less powerful and careful in choosing his words.

show abstract

A Critical Discourse Analysis of American and Arabic Political Discourses

Salih¹

2023

J.A.A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Analysis of the Prime Minster Abdulla Hamdok’s Speech from Rhetoric and Linguistic Perspective

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

A Critical Discourse Analysis of American and Arabic Political Discourses

A Critical Discourse Analysis of American and Arabic Political Discourses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About