2005
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2005.862924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the response of capture-gated organic scintillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other articles on the response of scintillator materials to neutrons and gamma rays have been published, including Refs. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Simulations of spectra resulting from photon interactions for a variety of sources with NaI(Tl) and PVT-based gamma-ray detectors have been reported by Siciliano et al [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other articles on the response of scintillator materials to neutrons and gamma rays have been published, including Refs. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Simulations of spectra resulting from photon interactions for a variety of sources with NaI(Tl) and PVT-based gamma-ray detectors have been reported by Siciliano et al [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we ignored the light output from carbon recoils for two reasons: first, the average energy transferred to carbon per captured neutron is very small; second, the light yield of carbon is much less than that of a proton of the same energy [25]. The combination of these two effects leads to an overall negligible contribution of carbon recoils to the total light output for the neutron energy region studied [27]. The obtained proton light output in each interaction was then broadened by the detector energy resolution function.…”
Section: Dependence Of Light Output On Neutron Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output format of the MCNP-PoliMi simulations allows for flexibility in simulating the response of this and other detector types [3][4].…”
Section: Simulation Of Detector Responsementioning
confidence: 99%