2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0436-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the SAGES Outcomes Initiative groin hernia database

Abstract: First analysis of the SAGES Outcomes Initiative groin hernia database demonstrates that (a) this is one of the largest prospective; voluntary hernia registries; (b) missing data are infrequent; and (c) the data are similar to published data from national, mandatory registries and randomized trials. Although the SAGES Outcomes Initiative is a voluntary registry, initially designed for surgeon self-assessment, and it therefore has the potential for methodological concerns inherent to voluntary registries, the fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total number of publications included was therefore 23 (figure 1; table 1). (13-35) After averaging data from publications from the same country and inclusion of the primary data from Malawi, 13 countries were included in the analysis, including four LICs (Malawi, Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Uganda), two L-MICs (Ghana and Nigeria), two H-MICs (Malaysia and Turkey) and five HICs (Denmark, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States) (table 2). Most hernias included in this analysis were inguinal; in studies reporting other types of hernias, these represented a minority of patients ( femoral, 0.1% to 8%; ventral,3 to 11%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of publications included was therefore 23 (figure 1; table 1). (13-35) After averaging data from publications from the same country and inclusion of the primary data from Malawi, 13 countries were included in the analysis, including four LICs (Malawi, Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Uganda), two L-MICs (Ghana and Nigeria), two H-MICs (Malaysia and Turkey) and five HICs (Denmark, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States) (table 2). Most hernias included in this analysis were inguinal; in studies reporting other types of hernias, these represented a minority of patients ( femoral, 0.1% to 8%; ventral,3 to 11%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven clinical outcomes assessment tools specific to hernia surgery are in use internationally, 167 174 as is one patient outcomes assessment tool. 175 Several hernia registries exist (Swedish Hernia Registry, Danish Hernia Registry, HerniaMed, Club Hernie, EuraHS, Dutch Hernia Registry, Evereg and AHSQC).…”
Section: Outcomes and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichtenstein procedure and plug and patch repair, or endoscopic approach, e.g. TAPP and TEP) have been analysed in various trials and result in a quicker postoperative recovery [ 41 , 46 , 56 , 68 , 129 , 147 , 168 , 176 , 178 , 197 , 198 , 272 , 311 ].…”
Section: Guidelines For the Treatment Of Inguinal Hernia In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%