“…In particular, technical and tactical studies have been focused on team efficacy (Argudo et al, 2007(Argudo et al, , 2008Lupo et al, 2009), tactical roles (Lupo et al, 2012), a competition level (Lupo et al, 2010), match outcomes (Argudo et al, 2007(Argudo et al, , 2009 and margin of victory (Gomez et al, 2014;Lupo et al, 2012Lupo et al, , 2014. Descriptive studies of the game (Canossa et al, 2009), analysis of technical actions (Alcaraz et al, 2011;Vila et al, 2011), specific playing positions (Sabio et al, 2020) and notational analysis (Argudo et al 2007;Lupo et al, 2014). Also the analysis of the playing action in Water polo has looked for technical and tactical performance indicators (Escalante et al, 2012;Mirvic et al, 2011), characterized the type of actions and their physical demands in relation to their intensity (D´Auria & Gabbet, 2008;Lupo et al, 2009), described the game profiles for each specific position (Lozovina et al, 2010;Lupo et al, 2012), found the effects of the regulatory changes (Argudo et al, 2020), analysed the influence of time out (Platanou, 2008), game location (Prieto et al, 2013), scoreboard result (Lupo et al, 2012), for having the first ball possession of each period (Argudo, 2010); and, calculated the effectiveness in each situational framework (Argudo et al, 2010).…”