2008
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31815c9446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Soft Tissue Facial Profile of Croatians Using of Linear Measurements

Abstract: One hundred and ten subjects (52 males and 58 females) between 23-28 years of age with dental Class I occlusal relationship, good soft tissue profile, and Caucasian ethnicity were selected from the population of dental students at the University of Zagreb, Croatia. The soft tissue facial profiles were digitally analyzed using linear (11 vertical and 14 horizontal) measurements made with standardized photographic records, taken in natural head position, to determine average soft tissue facial profile for males … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All the angles were larger in women. This finding was similar to the studies of Malko0 et al, 25 Milosevi0 et al, 24 and Fernández-Riveiro et al 4 Interestingly, the angular values in these racial/ethnic groups were close to the values found in the current study. Among the 3 angles, the nasofrontal angle rather than the nasal tip angle and the nasolabial angle demonstrated significant sex difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…All the angles were larger in women. This finding was similar to the studies of Malko0 et al, 25 Milosevi0 et al, 24 and Fernández-Riveiro et al 4 Interestingly, the angular values in these racial/ethnic groups were close to the values found in the current study. Among the 3 angles, the nasofrontal angle rather than the nasal tip angle and the nasolabial angle demonstrated significant sex difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Many linear and angular measures of the soft tissue profile, and a variety of cephalometric analyses, have been developed to determine the ideal facial proportions [1720]. Beauty is not an exact science, but according to some plastic surgeons, there is a specific proportion system that takes into account facial height, width and symmetry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] It is not possible to evaluate the soft tissues from the frontal view by using cephalometric radiographs. In addition to cephalometric radiographs, soft tissue evaluation has been carried out by means of different methods such as anthropometry, [6][7][8][9][10] two-or threedimensional photogrammetry, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and three-dimensional imaging techniques. 24,25 Among these methods, two-dimensional photogrammetry has the advantage of being a basic, noninvasive, cost-effective, and quick method that requires minimal time and equipment in the assessment of soft tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%