1985
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90568-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the spontaneous variability of ventricular arrhythmias: Consecutive ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings of ventricular tachycardia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure was described by Morganroth et a115 and Pratt et al, 22 and it represents the percent suppression required to show a significant departure from spontaneous variability or the percent suppression required to show a true drug effect. This measure was obtained for both total PVCs per hour and repetitive ventricular beats per hour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure was described by Morganroth et a115 and Pratt et al, 22 and it represents the percent suppression required to show a significant departure from spontaneous variability or the percent suppression required to show a true drug effect. This measure was obtained for both total PVCs per hour and repetitive ventricular beats per hour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used the former because of the patients' frequent VPBs in the baseline study. Since 24-hour ambulatory ECG shows day-to-day variations in the frequency of VPBs in individual patients, the criteria for efficacy were defined as a ->75% reduction in the total VPB count and a ->90% reduction in the couplet VPB count [13]. In the baseline study, frequent ventricular tacbycardias (->10 times a day) were recorded in only four patients, and we did not investigate the effect of therapies on ventricular tachycardia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'9 Comparison of these results with those of the present trial is difficult due to the low frequency of nonsustained VT in the previous study'9 and because there is a significant daily variability in the frequency of VT.22 24 In similar patients with a low frequency of VT (less than five runs of VT/day), we demonstrated that in many no VT (interpreted as " 1 00% VT suppression") is observed on a subsequent ambulatory electrocardiogram while they are on placebo.22 Our criterion for drug effect ('75% reduction in runs of nonsustained VT) was chosen to exceed known variability at the 95% confidence interval, given access to 3 days of ambulatory ECG information before and after drug therapy, which in our published experience must exceed a 68% reduction. 22 Although a 75% reduction in VT is adequate to define a "drug effect" or efficacy, it is clear that it may be clinically desirable and possibly mandatory to achieve a greater reduction in VT to decrease the incidence of sudden death, although this is not known at present. The entrance criterion of five or more runs of nonsustained VT was selected to eliminate patients with the greatest variability in VT and resulted in a patient population averaging 161 runs of VT daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%