Analysis of the Static and Dynamic Mechanical Behavior of a Tibial Bone-Knee Implant Assembly Without a Tibial Extension

Balaşa, Mihai-Constantin; Filip, Viviana

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26991-3_18

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The finite element (FE) method [ 30 , 31 ] has been used extensively in orthopedic biomechanics for evaluating the behavior of bone tissue and prosthetic implants. This method determines the tensile forces present in the bone tissue and establishes the connection with biological processes, such as bone remodeling [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], by creating a mathematical model that simulates this behavior.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tibial Stem Extension versus Standard Configuration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Assessment According to Bone Properties

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: This study’s purpose was to examine the benefit of using a tibial extension in the primary operation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is important because it is not a common practice to use the extension in a primary TKA, a standard configuration offering sufficient stability and good long-term survivorship. The following question arises: which situation requires the use of a standard configuration implant (without a stem) and which situation requires using the extension? Materials and Methods: The opportunity to use the tibial extension in the primary TKA was analyzed in correlation to the tibial bone structural properties. Using finite elements (FEs), the virtual model of the tibial bone was connected to that of the prosthetic implant, with and without a stem, and its behavior was analyzed during static and dynamic stresses, both in the situation in which the bone had normal physical properties, as well as in the case in which the bone had diminished physical properties. Results: The maximum stress and displacement values in the static compression regime show that adding a stem is only beneficial to structurally altered bone. Compression fatigue was reduced to almost half in the case of altered bone when adding a stem. Dynamic compression showed slightly better results with the tibial stem in both healthy and degraded bone. Conclusions: It was concluded that, if the bone is healthy and has good structural properties, it is not necessary to use the tibial extension in the primary operation; and if the bone has diminished physical properties, it is necessary to use the tibial extension at the primary operation, enhancing the stability, fixation, and implant lifespan.

show abstract