1976
DOI: 10.1084/jem.144.6.1494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the stimulation-inhibition paradox exhibited by lymphocytes exposed to concanavalin A.

Abstract: Lectins and various other proteins that bind to cell surface molecules can induce blast transformation in normal lymphocytes and have therefore been used extensively as tools in investigating both antigenic stimulation of lymphocytes and growth control of eukaryotic cells. Although the analysis of lymphocyte stimulation would ideally be carried out using antigens as mitogens, it is presently more feasible to study the detailed kinetics and biochemistry of the commitment to growth using lectins. A typical mitog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kinetic studies showed that this inhibition occurred at or immediately after the time when the cells became committed or stimulus-independent-that is, when removal of the concanavalin A did not prevent them from reentering the cell cycle and proceeding on to eventual DNA replication and mitosis. Furthermore, the binding of appropriate lectins at higher doses to the cell surface led both to a microtubule-dependent restriction of the mobility of cell surface receptors and, in parallel, the delivery of a dominant negative signal that inhibited the cell stimulation induced by the lectin (2,4). Thus, the inhibitory signal operated even in the face of ongoing stimulatory signals that had led to the commitment of the treated cells (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kinetic studies showed that this inhibition occurred at or immediately after the time when the cells became committed or stimulus-independent-that is, when removal of the concanavalin A did not prevent them from reentering the cell cycle and proceeding on to eventual DNA replication and mitosis. Furthermore, the binding of appropriate lectins at higher doses to the cell surface led both to a microtubule-dependent restriction of the mobility of cell surface receptors and, in parallel, the delivery of a dominant negative signal that inhibited the cell stimulation induced by the lectin (2,4). Thus, the inhibitory signal operated even in the face of ongoing stimulatory signals that had led to the commitment of the treated cells (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the binding of appropriate lectins at higher doses to the cell surface led both to a microtubule-dependent restriction of the mobility of cell surface receptors and, in parallel, the delivery of a dominant negative signal that inhibited the cell stimulation induced by the lectin (2,4). Thus, the inhibitory signal operated even in the face of ongoing stimulatory signals that had led to the commitment of the treated cells (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colchicine appears to block this early recruitment event (3). High doses of Con A induce anchorage modulation of surface receptors and inhibit mitogenesis but do not interfere with the primary growth signal (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier report, McClain and Edelman (19) suggested that lymphocytes were responsive to high doses of Con Proc. Natl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%