2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41225-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the tendency for the electronic conductivity to change during alcoholic fermentation

Abstract: The observation that the electronic conductivity begins to decease and then increases during alcoholic fermentation was first discovered in our work. To explain the tendency experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of the reducing sugar concentration, ethanol concentration, cell density, pH and ionic concentration. The results showed that the ionic concentration, reducing sugar concentration, cell concentration, pH and especially the ethanol concentration caused a change of the electronic conductiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conductivity values showed a slight tendency to increase with the duration of the experiment and can be correlated with the cell growth stages of the yeast strains used, the highest differences being recorded for S. cerevisiae fermentative strains ( S. cerevisiae CM6B70 (P3) and S. cerevisiae CMGB234 (P4)) in the case of lead and lead and cadmium double contaminations, respectively. The higher values of the conductivity observed at the end of the experiment might be an indication of the increase in the number of dead cells and the change of the ion flow (i.e., the release of ions by breaking the structure of cell membranes) [ 53 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conductivity values showed a slight tendency to increase with the duration of the experiment and can be correlated with the cell growth stages of the yeast strains used, the highest differences being recorded for S. cerevisiae fermentative strains ( S. cerevisiae CM6B70 (P3) and S. cerevisiae CMGB234 (P4)) in the case of lead and lead and cadmium double contaminations, respectively. The higher values of the conductivity observed at the end of the experiment might be an indication of the increase in the number of dead cells and the change of the ion flow (i.e., the release of ions by breaking the structure of cell membranes) [ 53 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study employing structure additive regression (STAR) illustrates a model that can be created gradually, making it easier to analyze and adjust for operators . Furthermore, novel biosensor development strategies have been explored to build new soft sensors with potentially higher predictive ability over significant offline variables. , …”
Section: Applications Of ML In Biosystems Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent example using structure additive regression (STAR) demonstrates a model that can be built in a stepwise fashion lending it to easier interpretation and adjustability for operators . Additionally, novel techniques for biosensor development have been explored to create new types of soft sensors that can potentially have more predictive power over important offline variables. , More complex models including neural networks have started to gain popularity for modeling nonlinear bioprocesses and in 2018 the first deep neural network applied to nonlinear bioprocess was used to predict penicillin concentration evolution in a bioreactor. ,, More complex neural network models have shown improved predictive power and generalizability, but they suffer from a lack of interpretability. , …”
Section: At the Process Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…132 In summary, the most popular area of study in bioprocess engineering related to ML is in the development of biosensors, since their upside promises reduced manual labor for testing offline variables and more accurate predictions of cellular performance. 127 Studies related to bioprocess engineering will likely gain momentum as researchers find more effective methods for data extraction and adopt standardized data collection practices. The general workflow for ML on the process level is largely focused on improving data collection and processing techniques to allow for robust, standard ML models to work consistently well (Figure 8).…”
Section: ■ At the Genome Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%