2018
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20185303059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the Thermophysical Properties and Influencing Factors of Various Rock Types From the Guizhou Province

Abstract: A series of analyses have been carried out on a number of rock types from the Guizhou Province to investigate their thermophysical properties. A total of 433 samples from 14 types of rock were collected, tested and analyzed. It was found that in this province, the average thermal conductivity of the samples ranged between 1.516±0.264 and 5.066±0.521 W/(m·K), the average specific heat capacity varied from 0.272±0.042 to 0.603±0.096 kJ/(kg·°C), and the average thermal diffusion coefficients were from 0.752±0.331… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step in establishing the nature of the transformation was to determine the specific heat of the studied dolomite, for which a value of 932.74 J/kg∙K was obtained. This result is in agreement with values reported in the literature [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The fundamental problem addressed in the study was the determination of the rate of heat exchange between the rock and the gas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first step in establishing the nature of the transformation was to determine the specific heat of the studied dolomite, for which a value of 932.74 J/kg∙K was obtained. This result is in agreement with values reported in the literature [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The fundamental problem addressed in the study was the determination of the rate of heat exchange between the rock and the gas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The averaged result obtained in the experiments is very close to the values for the specific heat of dolomite reported in the literature, which range from approximately 850 to 950 J/(kg·K) [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the rocks should have different thermal behaviour because of their different characteristics. For example, there is an appreciable difference in the specific heat of limestone (0.515 ± 0.015 kJ/kg • C) and dolostone (0.553 ± 0.082 kJ/kg • C) [56], which suggests that there is different thermal behaviour between the two lithologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these measurements were performed in a vertical line scan along the center of a typical 60 mm long, 12.5 g returned Mars sample, ~0.76 J maximum would be transferred in total, equivalent to a maximum dose of ~61 Gy. If all this energy was absorbed as heat, assuming a lower end heat capacity for a basalt of 400 J kg −1 K −1 (Xiaoqing et al., 2018), this would result in a sample temperature increase of 0.15 K. This upper limit is much lower than required to avoid effects on amino acid content (Friedrich et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%