2014
DOI: 10.17000/kspr.21.3.201409.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the ‘Time Selective Job policy’ : A Comparative Study on South Korea, Netherlands and Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns have been raised, however, over the sustainability of the subsidy programme. Critics argued that the expiration of the subsidy programme would result in unstable and low-paying jobs, even adding non-standard employees to the Korean female labour market (Kim and Lee, 2014).…”
Section: Female Employment Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerns have been raised, however, over the sustainability of the subsidy programme. Critics argued that the expiration of the subsidy programme would result in unstable and low-paying jobs, even adding non-standard employees to the Korean female labour market (Kim and Lee, 2014).…”
Section: Female Employment Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many Korean scholars have expressed concern over the negative implications of the expansion of part-time employment on the quality of the female labour market. They argue that the current part-time employment policy reinforces the gender gap in the Korean labour market because -compared to full-timers -part-timers tend to have less opportunities for wage increases, promotion and career development (Lee, 2012;Kim and Lee, 2014;Shin, 2015). In order to identify whether the Korean part-time employment policy is reducing or reproducing gender inequality in the labour market, we may need empirical evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%