2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4932217
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the track‐ and dose‐averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code

Abstract: When the geant 4 particle tracking method is used to calculate the average LET values within targets with a small step limit, such as smaller than 500 μm, the authors recommend the use of LETt in the dose plateau region and LETd around the Bragg peak. For a large step limit, i.e., 500 μm, LETd is recommended along the whole Bragg curve. The transition point depends on beam parameters and can be found by determining the location where the gradient of the ratio of LETd and LETt becomes positive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
103
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
9
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) for implementation into the simulation, LET was modeled for in Geant4 although an alternative approach would be to measure the LET values by averaging the collision energy deposited over a finite trajectory length as described by Guan et al.,29 along with the depth dose curve and measured scintillated light output. The current model neglects any ionization that comes from secondary particles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) for implementation into the simulation, LET was modeled for in Geant4 although an alternative approach would be to measure the LET values by averaging the collision energy deposited over a finite trajectory length as described by Guan et al.,29 along with the depth dose curve and measured scintillated light output. The current model neglects any ionization that comes from secondary particles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCNPX simulation provided dose and total fluence (the number of protons traversing an area) in each voxel, which were used to calculate the track-averaged LET (LET t ) [32]. Although most studies have been based on dose-averaged LET (LET d ), the LET t is an acceptable approximation for LET d for lower values of LET, such as those encountered in most treatment plans, because LET t is linearly proportional to LET d in this low-LET region [33]. Many of the treatment plans consisted of a primary plan and 1 or 2 boost plans.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As particles of a given energy of therapeutic interest traverse a medium, they lose energy continuously. The rate of energy loss per unit distance, i.e., the linear energy transfer (LET, defined mathematically as dE/dx ), increases first slowly and linearly and then very sharply near the end of the particle range (Figure 1 [1]). Increasing LET also leads to increasing ionization density along the particle track, which, in turn, leads to increasing amount and complexity of biological damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%