2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the use or non-use of e-scooters, their integration in the city of Munich (Germany) and their potential as an additional mobility system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… The vast majority of trips that are now being conducted with a shared e-scooter would have been conducted on foot or with public transport if the e-scooters were not available. This result is in full agreement with previous research in the other European cities such as Vienna, Austria (Laa and Leth, 2020) and Munich, Germany (Sellaouti, Arslan and Hoffmann, 2020), as well as with the results of a study in Calgary, Canada which identifies that almost half trips would have been completed on foot (City of Calgary, 2020). However, this finding is interestingly in contrast with what studies from U.S. cities point out (San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, 2019;Portland Bureau of Transportation, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“… The vast majority of trips that are now being conducted with a shared e-scooter would have been conducted on foot or with public transport if the e-scooters were not available. This result is in full agreement with previous research in the other European cities such as Vienna, Austria (Laa and Leth, 2020) and Munich, Germany (Sellaouti, Arslan and Hoffmann, 2020), as well as with the results of a study in Calgary, Canada which identifies that almost half trips would have been completed on foot (City of Calgary, 2020). However, this finding is interestingly in contrast with what studies from U.S. cities point out (San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, 2019;Portland Bureau of Transportation, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the other end of the spectrum, several studies have found present cost and price as negatively influencing the use of e-MM (Nematchoua et al, 2020;Bielinski and Wazna, 2020;Behrendt, 2018;Ling et al, 2017;Popovich et al, 2014a;Elias and Gitelman, 2018;Fitt and Curl, 2019;Jones et al, 2016;Biegańska et al, 2021;De Ceunynck et al, 2021;Esztergár-Kiss and Lopez Lizarraga, 2021;Kazemzadeh and Koglin, 2021;Kwiatkowski et al, 2021;Sellaouti et al, 2020), both in terms of costs associated with private ownership of the vehicles (acquisition price and maintenance cost) as well as costs required to access shared vehicles (usage or monthly fees).…”
Section: Monetary Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety. Safety is repeatedly found as the most negatively perceived factor by both users and non-users of e-MM (Bieliński et al, 2020;Jones et al, 2016;Sellaouti et al, 2020;Simsekoglu and Klöckner, 2019b;Ling et al, 2017;Rayaprolu and Venigalla, 2020;Elias and Gitelman, 2018;Zuev, 2018;Fitt and Curl, 2019;Bateman et al, 2021;Bielinski et al, 2021;De Ceunynck et al, 2021;Eccarius et al, 2021;Esztergár-Kiss and Lopez Lizarraga, 2021;Hardt et al, 2019;Munkacsy and Monzon, 2017). This unsafe perception is aggravated by most participants recognizing that in most cases infrastructure is not yet ready to support e-MM (i.e., not enough lanes or parking) (Nematchoua et al, 2020;Glavić et al, 2021;Bateman et al, 2021;Leger et al, 2019;Popovich et al, 2014a;Eccarius and Lu, 2018;Washington et al, 2018).…”
Section: Time Savingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations