2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the variation in use-dependent inactivation of high-threshold tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium currents recorded from rat sensory neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably, the greater than expected decrease in whole-cell Na + current was the result of the accumulation of slow inactivation of high-threshold TTXr Na + channels. Even though typical steady-state inactivation experiments indicate maximum availability for Na V 1.8 channels at À60 mV, changing the HP from À80 mV to À60 mV enhances use-dependent slow inactivation of these channels Tripathi et al, 2006).…”
Section: (F) Plot Of I H Amplitude Versus Whole-cell Capacitance For mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Probably, the greater than expected decrease in whole-cell Na + current was the result of the accumulation of slow inactivation of high-threshold TTXr Na + channels. Even though typical steady-state inactivation experiments indicate maximum availability for Na V 1.8 channels at À60 mV, changing the HP from À80 mV to À60 mV enhances use-dependent slow inactivation of these channels Tripathi et al, 2006).…”
Section: (F) Plot Of I H Amplitude Versus Whole-cell Capacitance For mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Inset: stimulation protocol. leading to decrease in threshold, increase in repetitive firing, burst firing and reduction of conductance block (Baker 2005;Blair and Bean 2003;Maingret et al 2008;Tripathi et al 2006). The resulting overall increase in nociceptive output likely contributes to TNF-␣-mediated increase in excitability.…”
Section: Table 3 Values and Statistical Analysis Of Differences In Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The midpoint of TTX-R slow inactivation is actually more hyperpolarized than that for fast inactivation (Blair & Bean, 2003), in marked contrast to the reverse situation commonly found for TTX-S currents (Kuo & Bean, 1994;Fleidervish et al 1996;Fazan et al 2001). Build-up of slow inactivation is likely to be responsible for the use-dependent inhibition of TTX-R currents on repetitive stimulation (Rush et al 1998;Blair & Bean, 2003;Tripathi et al 2006) and the cell-to-cell variations in TTX-R current properties seen in these studies might reflect regulation of Na v 1.8 by calmodulin J Physiol 579.1 (Choi et al 2006). Interestingly, use-dependent slow inactivation of Na v 1.8 current is stronger and develops more rapidly in IB4+ DRG neurons, compared to IB4-DRG neurons, and recovery from slow inactivation is slower in IB4+ neurons (Choi et al 2007), adding to evidence (Stucky & Lewin, 1999;Braz et al 2005;Fang et al 2006) that these subclasses of DRG neurons are functionally distinct.…”
Section: Figure 5 Putative Roles Of Different Sodium Channel Subtypementioning
confidence: 99%