ELIT-2018 2018
DOI: 10.30970/elit2018.a39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Theoretical Models for Nonlinear Fitting of Experimental Data: Dielectric Permittivity of Pb4.95Ge3O11 Crystals

Abstract: We implement nonlinear fitting and select the best theoretical model for description of experimental data, basing on the programming language Java. This is achieved using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and the bootstrapping for determining confidence intervals for the fitting parameters. The main technical procedures are illustrated on the temperature dependence of dielectric permittivity of non-stoichiometric LG crystals in their paraelectric phase. Our results confirm that the model incorporating a temper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the dielectric data can be successfully explained in terms of the Curie-Weiss behavior with a non-negligible temperature-dependent background, rather than by assuming a diffuse PT. Note that the above result somewhat differs from the conclusion drawn in our earlier work [38] for the πœ€(𝑇) function obtained at a different electric-field frequency. However, only the particular cases of formula (3.1) with πœ€ 𝐡 = 0 and formula (3.2) with πœ€ 𝐡 = const were compared in the study [38] as theoretical models.…”
Section: Data Interpretation and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, the dielectric data can be successfully explained in terms of the Curie-Weiss behavior with a non-negligible temperature-dependent background, rather than by assuming a diffuse PT. Note that the above result somewhat differs from the conclusion drawn in our earlier work [38] for the πœ€(𝑇) function obtained at a different electric-field frequency. However, only the particular cases of formula (3.1) with πœ€ 𝐡 = 0 and formula (3.2) with πœ€ 𝐡 = const were compared in the study [38] as theoretical models.…”
Section: Data Interpretation and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the above result somewhat differs from the conclusion drawn in our earlier work [38] for the πœ€(𝑇) function obtained at a different electric-field frequency. However, only the particular cases of formula (3.1) with πœ€ 𝐡 = 0 and formula (3.2) with πœ€ 𝐡 = const were compared in the study [38] as theoretical models.…”
Section: Data Interpretation and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation