2015
DOI: 10.3901/cjme.2015.0228.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of thermoelastohydrodynamic performance of journal misaligned engine main bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the crankshaft axial movement is not considered, the minimum oil film thickness is reduced to varying degrees with considering the influence of the surface roughness compared with not considering surface roughness. 14,15 On the basis of considering the axial movement, the change trend and degree of minimum oil film thickness are significantly changed when considering the influence of surface roughness compared with not considering the surface roughness. The minimum oil film thickness of No.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the crankshaft axial movement is not considered, the minimum oil film thickness is reduced to varying degrees with considering the influence of the surface roughness compared with not considering surface roughness. 14,15 On the basis of considering the axial movement, the change trend and degree of minimum oil film thickness are significantly changed when considering the influence of surface roughness compared with not considering the surface roughness. The minimum oil film thickness of No.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boedo, 11 Rao et al, 12 and Brito et al 13 analyzed the effects of the structural parameters of bearings on the lubricating property of misaligned journal bearing. Bi et al, 14 Sun et al, 15 and Lorenz et al 16 studied the lubrication performances of crankshaft bearings considering the influence of surface topography based on the average Reynolds equation, which found that the surface topography parameters had a substantial impact on bearing lubrication characteristics. You et al 17 compared the effects of the continuous beam crankshaft model and the simply supported beam crankshaft model on the crankshaft deformation, and pointed out that the former can more accurately reflect the dynamic response of the crankshaft bearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrying the larger loading capacity of the magnetized journal bearings with a squeeze dynamic action such as in the internal combustion engine, the measure unit of oil-film thickness is usually expressed in micron, for the maximum oil-film pressure that is often bigger than the value of 10 MPa and the stiffness of the journal bearing (bearing block) is smaller due to its structure design limit. 1,2 According to this analysis, the effects of the elastic deformation of working surface have a great importance in the pressure distribution of the oil film and its loading capacity. For example, some papers 3,4 have reported that loading capacity of rigid journal bearing is bigger than that of journal bearing considering its materials elastic deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies, the rotational parts were considered as a whole in the rubbing system without considering the blade-disk structure and other parts of the rotor system. 14 But the blade-casing rubbing is more complex compared with the “rotor-stator rubbing” case because lots of nonlinear phenomena could appear in the former case. 5 Padovan and Choy 6 used a Jeffcott rotor with a cantilever beam blade to conduct a blade-casing fault model, and the influence of unbalance eccentricity and blade stiffness on the rotor dynamics were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%