Analysis of trace residual 1,3-butadiene in poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene-co-styrene)

Choi, Sung‐Seen; Kim, Yun-Ki

doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2010.10.031

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the literature , two chromatographic techniques are mainly performed to analyse contaminants which are susceptible to migrate from the packaging to the product: gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) and high‐performance liquid chromatography–UV detector (HPLC‐UV). GC‐MS has been chosen because most migrants are volatile compounds, and this technique was previously used by EXPERTOX for the evaluation of packaging migration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of the method of the content‐containing interaction evaluation for cosmetic products by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Charron¹,

Vaugelade²,

Richard³

et al. 2018

Intern J of Cosmetic Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In July 2013, the European Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 came into effect in order to secure cosmetic products. The content-containing interaction between the packaging and the product must be considered for the safety assessment. Indeed, some compounds are able to migrate from the packaging to the product and may be harmful to the consumer health. This is why a first test was established by EXPERTOX laboratory in 2012 to deal with this new regulation. A new analytical method was developed and validated for the quantification of 23 substances able to migrate from the packaging to the product. It was applied on a plastic packaging with the five simulants of migration. To evaluate the content-containing interaction, a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method was developed and validated. Liquid-liquid extraction was used to extract contaminants (thirteen phthalates and ten substances of very high concern) from migration simulants. Calibration curves showed good linearity regression from 2 to 50 μg mL for nineteen molecules and from 5 to 45 μg mL for the others. The limits of quantification were respectively 2 and 5 μg mL . The accuracy, precision, repeatability of the analytical method and extraction yields were acceptable. No molecule was found in simulants of migration, so the potential contaminants present in the packaging did not migrate. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method and liquid-liquid extraction were validated for 23 molecules and can be used for the evaluation of the content-containing interaction of cosmetic products. Both quantification and extraction procedures are more robust and faster than previous method.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of the method of the content‐containing interaction evaluation for cosmetic products by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Charron¹,

Vaugelade²,

Richard³

et al. 2018

Intern J of Cosmetic Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In particular, oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane has attracted much attention as a promising process for producing C 4 olefins such as n-butene and 1,3-butadiene [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Increasing demand for n-butene and 1,3-butadiene makes this process more economical, because cheap and abundant n-butane is employed as a starting material for producing n-butene and 1,3-butadiene [9,[11][12][13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane over Mg3(VO4)2/MgO–ZrO2 catalysts: Effect of oxygen capacity and acidity of the catalysts

Lee

Hong

et al. 2012

Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thermal Extraction: An Alternative Headspace GC–MS Method for Volatile Extractables from Medical Device Materials

Patabandige

Nahan

Young

et al. 2023

Biomedical Materials & Devices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysis of trace residual 1,3-butadiene in poly(acrylonitrile-co-butadiene-co-styrene)

Cited by 6 publications

References 10 publications

Optimization of the method of the content‐containing interaction evaluation for cosmetic products by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Optimization of the method of the content‐containing interaction evaluation for cosmetic products by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane over Mg3(VO4)2/MgO–ZrO2 catalysts: Effect of oxygen capacity and acidity of the catalysts

Thermal Extraction: An Alternative Headspace GC–MS Method for Volatile Extractables from Medical Device Materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About