2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows a simple schematic diagram of SEM along with the various kinds of variables. The equations of SEM are specified by direct links between these variables, which can be called "the simultaneous equations" [30]. SEM is defined using three sets of equations: structural equations, and measurement equations for both the endogenous and exogenous variables [31].…”
Section: Structural Equation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a simple schematic diagram of SEM along with the various kinds of variables. The equations of SEM are specified by direct links between these variables, which can be called "the simultaneous equations" [30]. SEM is defined using three sets of equations: structural equations, and measurement equations for both the endogenous and exogenous variables [31].…”
Section: Structural Equation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic accident prediction models have been developed to understand the factors affecting traffic accidents and eventually to reduce traffic accidents by controlling and/or improving factors [5]. As far as the authors are aware the first accident-prediction models for multi-lane roads were devised by Persaud and Dzbik [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent Disability due to Road Crashes The concept of a factor loading value of 0.5 is regarded as acceptable; the manifest variables with loading values of less than 0.5 should be dropped [25,26]. Some researchers [27] argue that 0.4 should be the acceptable loading, however, some [21] suggested that "manifest variable with loading values between 0.4 and 0.7 should be reviewed before elimination.…”
Section: Tm Presence Of Emergency Room Injury Surveillance Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings end up with the analysis that road factors, driver factors and environmental factors were strongly related to the accident size" [26]. A similar type of analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between accident severity and accident type [36], between gender, anxiety, depression, reward sensitivity, sensation seeking propensity and risky driving [37], between psychological symptoms, sensation seeking, aggression, dysfunctional drinking habits, aberrant driving behavior, speed and accidents [38].…”
Section: Sem and Road Safety Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation