2000
DOI: 10.1109/8.876325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of transient electromagnetic scattering from closed surfaces using a combined field integral equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
104
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is known to provide accurate results for the EFIE and therefore is also employed for the discretization and solution of the MFIE and CFIE [Hodges and RahmatSamii, 1997;Song et al, 1998;Shanker et al, 2000;Rius et al, 2001]. Unfortunately, compared to the EFIE results, the MFIE results are observed to be plagued with an inaccuracy problem persistent for a wide variety of scattering problems, even for the solution of simple geometries, such as the sphere [Ergül and Gürel, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This approach is known to provide accurate results for the EFIE and therefore is also employed for the discretization and solution of the MFIE and CFIE [Hodges and RahmatSamii, 1997;Song et al, 1998;Shanker et al, 2000;Rius et al, 2001]. Unfortunately, compared to the EFIE results, the MFIE results are observed to be plagued with an inaccuracy problem persistent for a wide variety of scattering problems, even for the solution of simple geometries, such as the sphere [Ergül and Gürel, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since the system is greatly decoupled (hence the size for the deconvolution problem is greatly decreased), marching-on-in-time or time-stepping approach [52] is easy to be applied here. While details are not given in this paper, readers are referred to [43,45] for a more complete description.…”
Section: Marching-on-in-time Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this paper, we will use the time domain Poggio-Miller-Chang-Harrington-Wu (TD-PMCHW) equations that were found harder to stabilize than the TD-EFIE or the time domain magnetic field integral equation (TD-MFIE) for dielectric bodies [18]. The use of the combined-field type TD-PMCHW equations is important in terms of eliminating the possible spurious solutions near the resonant frequencies, because either TD-EFIE or TD-MFIE for conducting bodies has been found to give wrong results near these frequency points when the data in time domain are transformed to frequency domain [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 2 is dedicated to formulations by employing the induced equivalent polarization and magnetization as unknown functions. In the past, induced equivalent electric and magnetic currents are commonly used as unknown functions, by which extra temporal integrals have to be performed to find the electric and magnetic charges to calculate the scalar potentials [6,16,19]. To avoid doing the integrals, the governing equations, i.e., the boundary conditions, are differentiated with respect to time [7,9,10,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%