2015
DOI: 10.18821/1560-9545-2014-19-4-11-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Tremor Activity of Antagonist Muscles in Essential Tremor and Parkinson’s Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, EMG analysis methods evolved from spectral analysis [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] and time-domain signal analysis methods such as morphological analysis [ 8 ], amplitude analysis [ 9 ], and autoregressive analysis [ 10 , 11 ] towards time–frequency domain analysis [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The state-of-the-art of EMG analysis methods is characterized by the active use of nonlinear data analysis methods [ 17 ], such as fractal analysis [ 18 ], phase analysis [ 19 ], recurrent quantification analysis [ 4 , 20 , 21 ], and the deep learning of neural networks [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. According to the authors, the existing methods for analyzing EEG, EMG, and tremor signals, such as wavelet analysis [ 26 , 27 , 28 ], focus on local time–frequency changes in the signal and, therefore, do not reveal the generalized properties of the signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, EMG analysis methods evolved from spectral analysis [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] and time-domain signal analysis methods such as morphological analysis [ 8 ], amplitude analysis [ 9 ], and autoregressive analysis [ 10 , 11 ] towards time–frequency domain analysis [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The state-of-the-art of EMG analysis methods is characterized by the active use of nonlinear data analysis methods [ 17 ], such as fractal analysis [ 18 ], phase analysis [ 19 ], recurrent quantification analysis [ 4 , 20 , 21 ], and the deep learning of neural networks [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. According to the authors, the existing methods for analyzing EEG, EMG, and tremor signals, such as wavelet analysis [ 26 , 27 , 28 ], focus on local time–frequency changes in the signal and, therefore, do not reveal the generalized properties of the signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis for PD risk factors found that the total RR was 1.70 [34], and there was a significant coupling between the intensity of tremor and the severity of hypertension [35]. ET patients had significantly reduced catecholamine metabolism and excretion [36], and some case reports indicated adverse effects of severe tremor in patients when treated with beta-blockers [37]. (2) Alteration cerebral stiffness due to hypertension may lead to decreased energy convergence of transcranial ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have expressed different and sometimes directly opposite opinions on this issue. In particular, several publications indicate the possibility of the differential diagnosis of PD and ET by analyzing the phase difference in antagonist muscle EMG signals with high accuracy [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. However, other authors have discussed about the inapplicability of this approach to the differential diagnosis of PD and ET because it cannot provide acceptable accuracy [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%