2022
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.830158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Tumor Glycosylation Characteristics and Implications for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor’s Efficacy for Breast Cancer

Abstract: The alterations of glycosylation, which is a common post-translational modification of proteins, have been acknowledged as key events in breast cancer (BC) oncogenesis and progression. The aberrant expression of glycosyltransferases leads to aberrant glycosylation patterns, posing the diagnostic potential in BC outcomes. The present study aims to establish a glycosyltransferase-based signature to predict BC prognosis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We firstly screened 9 glycosyltransferase genes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to eliminate the effect of heterogeneity, we included only signatures generated using the TCGA database. AUC was used to assess the predictive power of signatures, and a larger AUC indicates better classification ability ( Fawcett, 2006 ), and it could be used to compare the performance of the signatures ( Zhang et al, 2021 ; Lv et al, 2022 ). We integrated all the important information of the thirteen signatures, including author, year, gene signature and the AUCs of the signatures ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to eliminate the effect of heterogeneity, we included only signatures generated using the TCGA database. AUC was used to assess the predictive power of signatures, and a larger AUC indicates better classification ability ( Fawcett, 2006 ), and it could be used to compare the performance of the signatures ( Zhang et al, 2021 ; Lv et al, 2022 ). We integrated all the important information of the thirteen signatures, including author, year, gene signature and the AUCs of the signatures ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, these reports highlight the underlying efficiency of glycosylation-based signature in predicting cancer prognosis. In our previous study, we successfully established a 9-gene signature under glycosylation characteristics for predicting BC prognosis, and BC patients with different outcomes obviously got different risk scores ( 15 ). Based on this, we further constructed an 8-GT-lncRNA signature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…harnessed 4 glycosylation-related mRNAs to calculate the risk score in ovarian cancer, and the risk score was negatively correlated with tumor purity and tumor mutation burden, which suggested that low-risk scores might predict a better benefit from ICI treatment ( 14 ). Our previous study screened 9 glycosyltransferase genes to develop a prognostic signature in BC, and the high-risk-group patients showed shorter survival probability and more immunosuppressive profile ( 15 ). However, there are no reports on establishing prognostic signature based on glycosylation-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) for predicting BC prognosis and response to ICI therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the eight key genes potentially targeted by the above three miRNAs identified in our study, STT3A, a catalytic subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase, increases amyloid- β production by promoting N-glycosylation in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease [ 50 ]. Besides, the expression level of STT3A was found to be negatively related to the biomarker expressions of M1 macrophages in breast cancer [ 51 ], indicating that STT3A may be involved in the regulating macrophage activation. Although the mechanism of regulating macrophages or mast cells has been extensively study, whether hsa-miR-15b-5p/hsa-miR-184/hsa-miR-16-5p-STT3A axis is involved in the regulating macrophages or mast activation in IS need further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%